Selected article for: "action knowledge and actual number"

Author: Valle, Coralie; Martin, Baptiste; Touret, Franck; Shannon, Ashleigh; Canard, Bruno; Guillemot, Jean‐Claude; Coutard, Bruno; Decroly, Etienne
Title: Drugs against SARS‐CoV‐2: What do we know about their mode of action?
  • Cord-id: ug7v07ps
  • Document date: 2020_8_11
  • ID: ug7v07ps
    Snippet: The health emergency caused by the recent Covid‐19 pandemic highlights the need to identify effective treatments against the virus causing this disease (SARS‐CoV‐2). The first clinical trials have been testing repurposed drugs that show promising anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 effects in cultured cells. Although more than 2400 clinical trials are already under way, the actual number of tested compounds is still limited to approximately 20, alone or in combination. In addition, knowledge on their mo
    Document: The health emergency caused by the recent Covid‐19 pandemic highlights the need to identify effective treatments against the virus causing this disease (SARS‐CoV‐2). The first clinical trials have been testing repurposed drugs that show promising anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 effects in cultured cells. Although more than 2400 clinical trials are already under way, the actual number of tested compounds is still limited to approximately 20, alone or in combination. In addition, knowledge on their mode of action (MoA) is currently insufficient. Their first results reveal some inconsistencies and contradictory results and suggest that cohort size and quality of the control arm are two key issues for obtaining rigorous and conclusive results. Moreover, the observed discrepancies might also result from differences in the clinical inclusion criteria, including the possibility of early treatment that may be essential for therapy efficacy in patients with Covid‐19. Importantly, efforts should also be made to test new compounds with a documented MoA against SARS‐CoV‐2 in clinical trials. Successful treatment will probably be based on multitherapies with antiviral compounds that target different steps of the virus life cycle. Moreover, a multidisciplinary approach that combines artificial intelligence, compound docking, and robust in vitro and in vivo assays will accelerate the development of new antiviral molecules. Finally, large retrospective studies on hospitalized patients are needed to evaluate the different treatments with robust statistical tools and to identify the best treatment for each Covid‐19 stage. This review describes different candidate antiviral strategies for Covid‐19, by focusing on their mechanism of action.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal liver function and liver function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • abnormal liver function and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • action mechanism and liver function: 1
    • action mechanism and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • action mechanism and lopinavir ritonavir treat: 1
    • action mechanism and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • action mechanism and lung injury mouse: 1
    • action mechanism and mabs development: 1
    • additional work and liver function: 1
    • additional work and lung injury: 1, 2
    • liver function and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • liver function and lopinavir ritonavir treat: 1
    • liver function and lung injury: 1
    • lopinavir ritonavir and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12