Author: Indini, Alice; Cattaneo, Monica; Ghidini, Michele; Rijavec, Erika; Bareggi, Claudia; Galassi, Barbara; Gambini, Donatella; Ceriani, Rosalia; Ceriotti, Ferruccio; Berti, Emilio; Grossi, Francesco
Title: Triage process for the assessment of coronavirus disease 2019â€positive patients with cancer: The ONCOVID prospective study Cord-id: r24qmg7i Document date: 2020_12_3
ID: r24qmg7i
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are considered at high risk for the novel respiratory illness coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19). General measures to keep COVIDâ€19–free cancer divisions have been adopted worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of triage to identify COVIDâ€19 among patients with cancer. METHODS: From March 20 to April 17, 2020, data were collected from patients who were treated or followed at the authors' institution in a prospective clinical
Document: BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are considered at high risk for the novel respiratory illness coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19). General measures to keep COVIDâ€19–free cancer divisions have been adopted worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of triage to identify COVIDâ€19 among patients with cancer. METHODS: From March 20 to April 17, 2020, data were collected from patients who were treated or followed at the authors' institution in a prospective clinical trial. The primary endpoint was to estimate the cumulative incidence of COVIDâ€19–positive patients who were identified using a triage process through the aid of medical and patient questionnaires. Based on a diagnostic algorithm, patients with suspect symptoms underwent an infectious disease specialist's evaluation and a COVIDâ€19 swab. Serologic tests were proposed for patients who had symptoms or altered laboratory tests that did not fall into the diagnostic algorithm but were suspicious for COVIDâ€19. RESULTS: Overall, 562 patients were enrolled. Six patients (1%) were diagnosed with COVIDâ€19, of whom 4 (67%) had the disease detected through telehealth triage, and 2 patients (33%) without suspect symptoms at triage had the disease detected later. Seventyâ€one patients (13%) had suspect symptoms and/or altered laboratory tests that were not included in the diagnostic algorithm and, of these, 47 patients (73%) underwent testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody: 6 (13%) were positive for IgG (n = 5) or for both IgM and IgG (n = 1), and antibody tests were negative in the remaining 41 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The triage process had a positive effect on the detection of COVIDâ€19 in patients with cancer. Telehealth triage was helpful in detecting suspect patients and to keep a COVIDâ€19–free cancer center. The overall incidence of COVIDâ€19 diagnosis (1%) and antibody positivity (13%) in patients with suspect symptoms was similar to that observed in the general population.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- lombardy region and low observed: 1
- low number and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2
- low number and lymphocyte neutrophil ratio: 1, 2
- low observed and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2, 3, 4
- low observed and lymphocyte neutrophil ratio: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date