Author: Gao, Xuesong; Yang, Di; Yuan, Zheng; Zhang, Yijin; Li, Hongjie; Gao, Ping; Liu, Xiaomin; Zhao, Wenshan; Xiao, Te; Guan, Yanlin; Gao, Guiju; Duan, Xuefei
                    Title: Improving the early diagnosis of suspected patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study of 106 patients.  Cord-id: r4zbturu  Document date: 2020_6_30
                    ID: r4zbturu
                    
                    Snippet: INTRODUCTION An outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. This study aimed to analyze the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of patients with COVID-19 to better differentiate the suspected patients in Beijing, China. METHODOLOGY This was a retrospective, single-center study. Clinical and epidemiologic data were collected from suspected patients with COVID-19 admitted to Beijing Ditan Hospital from January 29 to February 21, 2020. RESULTS On
                    
                    
                    
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        
                            
                                Document: INTRODUCTION An outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. This study aimed to analyze the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of patients with COVID-19 to better differentiate the suspected patients in Beijing, China. METHODOLOGY This was a retrospective, single-center study. Clinical and epidemiologic data were collected from suspected patients with COVID-19 admitted to Beijing Ditan Hospital from January 29 to February 21, 2020. RESULTS One hundred and six patients (60 males and 46 females, median age 36 years) were enrolled. Thirty-six patients were ultimately laboratory confirmed. Fifty-three were excluded from the diagnosis of COVID-19. The remaining 17 patients were highly suspected, although their nucleic acid tests were repeatedly negative. The confirmed patients and highly suspected patients had a significantly higher proportion of epidemiologic history than the excluded patients (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in clinical symptoms or the underlying diseases among the three groups. The confirmed patients had a higher frequency of lymphopenia and eosinopenia than the highly suspected and excluded patients. Chest computed tomography scans showed bilateral lung involvement, and ground-glass opacity was more likely observed in the confirmed patients. CONCLUSION The clinical features of the confirmed patients with COVID-19 were insufficient for early diagnosis of COVID-19. The epidemiologic history was of great significance in the early diagnosis of COVID-19. More sensitive diagnostic methods are needed to aid the differential diagnosis of suspected patients with COVID-19.
 
  Search related documents: 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
  
 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date