Selected article for: "high accuracy and predictive performance"

Author: Tanujit Chakraborty; Indrajit Ghosh
Title: Real-time forecasts and risk assessment of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) cases: A data-driven analysis
  • Document date: 2020_4_14
  • ID: ba6mdgq3_45
    Snippet: The rationale behind the choice of RT as a potential model to find the important casual variables out of 10 input variables for the CFR estimates is the simplicity, easy interpretability, and high accuracy of the RT algorithm. We apply an optimal RT model to the dataset consisting of 50 different country samples and try to find out potential casual variables from the set of available variables that are related to the case-fatality rates. RT is im.....
    Document: The rationale behind the choice of RT as a potential model to find the important casual variables out of 10 input variables for the CFR estimates is the simplicity, easy interpretability, and high accuracy of the RT algorithm. We apply an optimal RT model to the dataset consisting of 50 different country samples and try to find out potential casual variables from the set of available variables that are related to the case-fatality rates. RT is implemented using 'rpart' [31] package in R with "minsplit" equals to 10% of the data as a control parameter. We have used RMSE, co-efficient of multiple determination (R 2 ), and adjusted R 2 (AdjR 2 ) to evaluate the predictive performance of the tree model used in this study [17] . An optimal regression tree is built with 7 variables with 'minsplit' = 5 with equal costs for each variable. The estimates of the performance metrics for the fitted tree are as follows: RMSE = 0.013, R 2 = 0.896, and AdjR 2 = 0.769. A variable importance list from the RT is given in Figure 7 and the fitted tree is provided in Figure 8 .

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • case fatality and country sample: 1
    • case fatality and optimal regression tree: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • case fatality and performance metric: 1
    • case fatality and potential model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • case fatality and predictive performance: 1
    • case fatality and regression tree: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • case fatality and RT choice: 1, 2
    • case fatality and RT model: 1, 2, 3
    • case fatality and tree model: 1
    • case fatality rate and CFR estimate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23