Author: Baum, Zachary M C; Bonmati, Ester; Cristoni, Lorenzo; Walden, Andrew; Prados, Ferran; Kanber, Baris; Barratt, Dean C; Hawkes, David J; Parker, Geoffrey J M; Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A M Gandini; Hu, Yipeng
Title: Image quality assessment for closed-loop computer-assisted lung ultrasound Cord-id: spyiwwvb Document date: 2020_8_20
ID: spyiwwvb
Snippet: We describe a novel, two-stage computer assistance system for lung anomaly detection using ultrasound imaging in the intensive care setting to improve operator performance and patient stratification during coronavirus pandemics. The proposed system consists of two deep-learning-based models. A quality assessment module automates predictions of image quality, and a diagnosis assistance module determines the likelihood-of-anomaly in ultrasound images of sufficient quality. Our two-stage strategy u
Document: We describe a novel, two-stage computer assistance system for lung anomaly detection using ultrasound imaging in the intensive care setting to improve operator performance and patient stratification during coronavirus pandemics. The proposed system consists of two deep-learning-based models. A quality assessment module automates predictions of image quality, and a diagnosis assistance module determines the likelihood-of-anomaly in ultrasound images of sufficient quality. Our two-stage strategy uses a novelty detection algorithm to address the lack of control cases available for training a quality assessment classifier. The diagnosis assistance module can then be trained with data that are deemed of sufficient quality, guaranteed by the closed-loop feedback mechanism from the quality assessment module. Integrating the two modules yields accurate, fast, and practical acquisition guidance and diagnostic assistance for patients with suspected respiratory conditions at the point-of-care. Using more than 25,000 ultrasound images from 37 COVID-19-positive patients scanned at two hospitals, plus 12 control cases, this study demonstrates the feasibility of using the proposed machine learning approach. We report an accuracy of 86% when classifying between sufficient and insufficient quality images by the quality assessment module. For data of sufficient quality, the mean classification accuracy in detecting COVID-19-positive cases was 95% on five holdout test data sets, unseen during the training of any networks within the proposed system.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- adoption lack and machine learning: 1
- lung ultrasound and lus feature: 1
- lung ultrasound and lus image frame: 1
- lung ultrasound and lus imaging: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- lung ultrasound and lus imaging bedside: 1, 2, 3, 4
- lung ultrasound and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- lung ultrasound lus imaging and lus imaging: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- lung ultrasound lus imaging and lus imaging bedside: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date