Selected article for: "cycle threshold and oropharyngeal swab"

Author: Patel, Monita R; Carroll, Darin; Ussery, Emily; Whitham, Hilary; Elkins, Christopher A; Noble-Wang, Judith; Rasheed, James Kamile; Lu, Xiaoyan; Lindstrom, Stephen; Bowen, Virginia; Waller, Jessica; Armstrong, Gregory; Gerber, Susan; Brooks, John T; Lu, Xioayan
Title: Performance of Oropharyngeal Swab Testing Compared With Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019-United States, January 2020-February 2020.
  • Cord-id: ui11jr2h
  • Document date: 2021_2_1
  • ID: ui11jr2h
    Snippet: Among 146 nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swab pairs collected ≤7 days after illness onset, Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction assay for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR) diagnostic results were 95.2% concordant. However, NP swab cycle threshold values were lower (indicating more virus) in 66.7% of concordant-positive pairs, suggesting NP swabs may more accurately detect the amount of SARS-CoV-2.
    Document: Among 146 nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swab pairs collected ≤7 days after illness onset, Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction assay for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR) diagnostic results were 95.2% concordant. However, NP swab cycle threshold values were lower (indicating more virus) in 66.7% of concordant-positive pairs, suggesting NP swabs may more accurately detect the amount of SARS-CoV-2.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1