Author: Adamidi, Eleni S.; Mitsis, Konstantinos; Nikita, Konstantina S.
Title: Artificial intelligence in clinical care amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review Cord-id: o796oc0j Document date: 2021_5_7
ID: o796oc0j
Snippet: The worldwide health crisis caused by the SARS-Cov-2 virus has resulted in>3 million deaths so far. Improving early screening, diagnosis and prognosis of the disease are critical steps in assisting healthcare professionals to save lives during this pandemic. Since WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic, several studies have been conducted using Artificial Intelligence techniques to optimize these steps on clinical settings in terms of quality, accuracy and most importantly time. The ob
Document: The worldwide health crisis caused by the SARS-Cov-2 virus has resulted in>3 million deaths so far. Improving early screening, diagnosis and prognosis of the disease are critical steps in assisting healthcare professionals to save lives during this pandemic. Since WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic, several studies have been conducted using Artificial Intelligence techniques to optimize these steps on clinical settings in terms of quality, accuracy and most importantly time. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic literature review on published and preprint reports of Artificial Intelligence models developed and validated for screening, diagnosis and prognosis of the coronavirus disease 2019. We included 101 studies, published from January 1st, 2020 to December 30th, 2020, that developed AI prediction models which can be applied in the clinical setting. We identified in total 14 models for screening, 38 diagnostic models for detecting COVID-19 and 50 prognostic models for predicting ICU need, ventilator need, mortality risk, severity assessment or hospital length stay. Moreover, 43 studies were based on medical imaging and 58 studies on the use of clinical parameters, laboratory results or demographic features. Several heterogeneous predictors derived from multimodal data were identified. Analysis of these multimodal data, captured from various sources, in terms of prominence for each category of the included studies, was performed. Finally, Risk of Bias (RoB) analysis was also conducted to examine the applicability of the included studies in the clinical setting and assist healthcare providers, guideline developers, and policymakers.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accurate diagnosis and local transmission: 1
- accurate diagnosis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- accurate diagnosis and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- accurate diagnosis and long short: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- accurate diagnosis and long short term: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- accurate diagnosis and long short term memory: 1, 2, 3, 4
- accurate diagnosis and lung pathology: 1
- accurate diagnosis and lymphocyte count: 1, 2
- accurate diagnosis and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43
- accurate diagnosis and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- accurate diagnosis and machine learning model develop: 1
- accurate method and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34
- accurate method and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- accurate method and long short: 1, 2, 3
- accurate method and long short term: 1, 2
- accurate method and long short term memory: 1, 2
- accurate method and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- accurate method and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- accurately negative predict and machine learning: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date