Author: Erikson, Susan
Title: COVIDâ€Apps: Misdirecting Public Health Attention in a Pandemic Cord-id: w92aq1kk Document date: 2021_8_5
ID: w92aq1kk
Snippet: When there is no vaccine for a disease, ‘Test, Trace, Treat/Isolate’ is the public health goâ€to directive. During the COVIDâ€19 pandemic, mobile phone apps are designed to improve on this. But COVIDâ€apps have not been effective as a public health tool. Countries spend millions to develop them, yet they have been shown to have terrible return on investment. This commentary explores why COVIDâ€apps are generally championed and provides three brief case studies (Germany, Sierra Leone, Can
Document: When there is no vaccine for a disease, ‘Test, Trace, Treat/Isolate’ is the public health goâ€to directive. During the COVIDâ€19 pandemic, mobile phone apps are designed to improve on this. But COVIDâ€apps have not been effective as a public health tool. Countries spend millions to develop them, yet they have been shown to have terrible return on investment. This commentary explores why COVIDâ€apps are generally championed and provides three brief case studies (Germany, Sierra Leone, Canada) of nonâ€app public health success. In conclusion, I argue that we need to get our public health care priorities straight: Better and more testing; increased investment in manual contact tracing and treatments; hospitalization when necessary; and wrapâ€around care – assistance with groceries, cleaning, child†or eldercare responsibilities, telehealth doctor appointment hookups – for sick people in home isolation.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date