Selected article for: "main analysis and sensitivity analysis"

Author: Mohammad Parohan; Sajad Yaghoubi; Asal Seraj; Mohammad Hassan Javanbakht; Payam Sarraf; Mahmoud Djalali
Title: Risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies
  • Document date: 2020_4_11
  • ID: ih37onc3_11
    Snippet: is the (which was not peer-reviewed) The copyright holder for this preprint . https://doi.org/10. 1101 performed the Cochran's Q test (I 2 ≥ 50% were considered between-study heterogeneity) (14). To 109 identify potential sources of heterogeneity, we did subgroup analysis according to the predefined 110 criteria as follows: age (≥65 vs. <65), gender (male vs. female), hypertension (yes vs. no), diabetes 111 (yes vs. no), COPD (yes vs. no) and.....
    Document: is the (which was not peer-reviewed) The copyright holder for this preprint . https://doi.org/10. 1101 performed the Cochran's Q test (I 2 ≥ 50% were considered between-study heterogeneity) (14). To 109 identify potential sources of heterogeneity, we did subgroup analysis according to the predefined 110 criteria as follows: age (≥65 vs. <65), gender (male vs. female), hypertension (yes vs. no), diabetes 111 (yes vs. no), COPD (yes vs. no) and CVDs (yes vs. no). In addition to the main analysis, we carried 112 out sensitivity analysis to find if the overall estimate depended on the effect size from a single 113 study. Assessing the publication bias was done by the formal test of Egger (15). All statistical 114 analyses were conducted using Stata, version 14.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA). P-115 values were considered significant at level of < 0.05.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents