Selected article for: "AUC curve and predictive model"

Author: Singh, K.; Valley, T. S.; Tang, S.; Li, B. Y.; Kamran, F.; Sjoding, M. W.; Wiens, J.; Otles, E.; Donnelly, J. P.; Wei, M. Y.; McBride, J. P.; Cao, J.; Penoza, C.; Ayanian, J. Z.; Nallamothu, B. K.
Title: Validating a Widely Implemented Deterioration Index Model Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients
  • Cord-id: tcmtjyo8
  • Document date: 2020_4_29
  • ID: tcmtjyo8
    Snippet: Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is straining the capacity of U.S. healthcare systems. Accurately identifying subgroups of hospitalized COVID-19 patients at high- and low-risk for complications would assist in directing resources. Objective: To validate the Epic Deterioration Index (EDI), a predictive model implemented in over 100 U.S. hospitals that has been recently promoted for use in COVID-19 patients. Methods: We studied adult patients admitted with COVID-19 to
    Document: Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is straining the capacity of U.S. healthcare systems. Accurately identifying subgroups of hospitalized COVID-19 patients at high- and low-risk for complications would assist in directing resources. Objective: To validate the Epic Deterioration Index (EDI), a predictive model implemented in over 100 U.S. hospitals that has been recently promoted for use in COVID-19 patients. Methods: We studied adult patients admitted with COVID-19 to non-ICU level care at a large academic medical center from March 9 through April 7, 2020. We used the EDI, calculated at 15-minute intervals, to predict a composite adverse outcome of ICU-level care, mechanical ventilation, or death during the hospitalization. In a subset of patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours, we also evaluated the ability of the EDI (range 0-100) to identify patients at low risk of experiencing this composite outcome during their remaining hospitalization. We evaluated model discrimination and calibration using both raw EDI scores and their slopes. Results: Among 174 COVID-19 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 61 (35%) experienced the composite outcome. Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of the EDI was 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.84). Patients who met or exceeded an EDI of 64.8 made up 17% of the study cohort and had an 80% probability of experiencing the outcome during their hospitalization with a median lead time of 28 hours from when the threshold was first exceeded to the outcome. Employing the EDI slope lowered the AUCs to 0.68 (95% CI 0.60-0.77) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.59-0.75) for slopes calculated over 4 and 8 hours, respectively. In a subset of 109 patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours and who had not experienced the composite outcome, 14 (13%) patients who never exceeded an EDI of 37.9 had a 93% probability of not experiencing the outcome throughout the rest of their hospitalization, suggesting low risk. Conclusion: In this validation study, we found the EDI identifies small subsets of high- and low-risk patients with fair discrimination. These findings highlight the need for hospitals to carefully evaluate prediction models before widespread operational use among COVID-19 patients.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • academic medical center and admission follow: 1
    • academic medical center and low acuity: 1
    • academic medical center and low acuity care: 1
    • admission follow and low acuity: 1