Author: Aditi Nayak; Shabatun J Islam; Anurag Mehta; Yi-An Ko; Shivani A Patel; Abhinav Goyal; Samaah Sullivan; Tene T Lewis; Viola Vaccarino; Alanna A Morris; Arshed A Quyyumi
Title: Impact of Social Vulnerability on COVID-19 Incidence and Outcomes in the United States Document date: 2020_4_14
ID: 2qthdldg_4
Snippet: The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.10.20060962 doi: medRxiv preprint Generalized linear mixed models, with negative binomial distribution or Poisson distribution when appropriate, 11 were used to examine the association of outcomes with SVI (reported as percentile of social vulnerability, with higher numbers representing increased vulnerability) and its sub-components incl.....
Document: The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.10.20060962 doi: medRxiv preprint Generalized linear mixed models, with negative binomial distribution or Poisson distribution when appropriate, 11 were used to examine the association of outcomes with SVI (reported as percentile of social vulnerability, with higher numbers representing increased vulnerability) and its sub-components including socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status, and housing type/transportation accessibility (Supplement). 5,6 Given differences in COVID-19 testing by state, state-specific random intercepts were incorporated in models to account for correlations among counties within the same state. Covariates included percentage of population aged >65 years and average HCC score. A sensitivity analysis was conducted using data from six states (New York, New Jersey, Washington, Massachusetts, Vermont, and Louisiana) with the highest levels of testing as of April 4 th , 2020. 12 Age-and HCC score-adjusted CFR and incidence were compared across medians of overall SVI using one-way ANOVA.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- average HCC score and household composition: 1
- average HCC score and housing type transportation: 1
- average HCC score and housing type transportation accessibility: 1
- average HCC score and minority status: 1
- average HCC score and mixed model: 1
- average HCC score and population percentage: 1, 2
- average HCC score and sensitivity analysis: 1
- average HCC score and social vulnerability: 1, 2
- average HCC score and social vulnerability percentile: 1, 2
- average HCC score and socioeconomic status: 1
- average HCC score and state county: 1
- average HCC score and state testing: 1
- average HCC score and type transportation: 1
- binomial distribution and high level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- binomial distribution and high number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- binomial distribution and increase vulnerability: 1
- binomial distribution and mixed model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- binomial distribution and negative binomial distribution: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81
- binomial distribution and Poisson distribution: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date