Selected article for: "acute respiratory failure and lung ultrasound examination"

Author: Mongodi, Silvia; Orlando, Anita; Arisi, Eric; Tavazzi, Guido; Santangelo, Erminio; Caneva, Luca; Pozzi, Marco; Pariani, Eleonora; Bettini, Giada; Maggio, Giuseppe; Perlini, Stefano; Preda, Lorenzo; Iotti, Giorgio Antonio; Mojoli, Francesco
Title: Lung Ultrasound in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure Reduces Conventional Imaging and Health Care Provider Exposure to COVID-19
  • Cord-id: yfjlbyn4
  • Document date: 2020_5_6
  • ID: yfjlbyn4
    Snippet: Abstract— Lung ultrasound gained a leading position in the last year as an imaging technique for the assessment and management of patients with acute respiratory failure. In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), its role may be of further importance because it is performed bedside and may limit chest X-ray and the need for transport to radiology for computed tomography (CT) scan. Since February 21, we progressively turned into a coronavirus-dedicated intensive care unit and applied an ultrasoun
    Document: Abstract— Lung ultrasound gained a leading position in the last year as an imaging technique for the assessment and management of patients with acute respiratory failure. In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), its role may be of further importance because it is performed bedside and may limit chest X-ray and the need for transport to radiology for computed tomography (CT) scan. Since February 21, we progressively turned into a coronavirus-dedicated intensive care unit and applied an ultrasound-based approach to avoid traditional imaging and limit contamination as much as possible. We performed a complete daily examination with lung ultrasound score computation and systematic search of complications (pneumothorax, ventilator-associated pneumonia); on-duty physicians were free to perform CT or chest X-ray when deemed indicated. We compared conventional imaging exams performed in the first 4 wk of the COVID-19 epidemic with those in the same time frame in 2019: there were 84 patients in 2020 and 112 in 2019; 64 and 22 (76.2% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001) had acute respiratory failure, respectively, of which 55 (85.9%) were COVID-19 in 2020. When COVID-19 patients in 2020 were compared with acute respiratory failure patients in 2019, the median number of chest X-rays was 1.0 (1.0–2.0) versus 3.0 (1.0–4.0) (p = 0.0098); 2 patients 2 (3.6%) versus 7 patients (31.8%) had undergone at least one thoracic CT scan (p = 0.001). A self-imposed ultrasound-based approach reduces the number of chest X-rays and thoracic CT scans in COVID-19 patients compared with patients with standard acute respiratory failure, thus reducing the number of health care providers exposed to possible contamination and sparing personal protective equipment.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute respiratory failure and lung assessment: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory failure and lung imaging: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory failure and lung involvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • acute respiratory failure and lung involvement bilateral: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory failure and lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • acute respiratory failure and lus examination: 1
    • acute respiratory failure patient and lung involvement: 1
    • acutely ill and lung imaging: 1, 2
    • acutely ill and lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3
    • lung aeration and lus center: 1, 2
    • lung assessment and lus examination: 1, 2, 3
    • lung imaging and lus examination: 1, 2
    • lung involvement and lus examination: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • lung monitoring and lus examination: 1, 2, 3
    • lung ultrasound and lus center: 1, 2, 3
    • lung ultrasound and lus examination: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24