Author: Sadr, Sara; Bafrani, Melika Arab; Abdollahi, Alireza; SeyedAlinaghi, Seyed Ahmad; Mohammadnejad, Esmaeil; Hossienzade, Roghieh; ShahmariGolestan, Fereshteh; Ahmadinejad, Zahra; Salehi, Mohamadreza; Javaherian, Mohammad; Kimyaee, Elahe; Jafari, Fatemeh; Ghiasvand, Fereshteh
Title: Distinguishing repeated polymerase chain reaction positivity from reâ€infections in COVIDâ€19 Cord-id: uu4spsxp Document date: 2021_7_23
ID: uu4spsxp
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Possibility of reinfection with SARSâ€CoVâ€2 changes our view on herd immunity and vaccination and can impact worldwide quarantine policies. We performed realâ€time polymerase chain reaction (RTâ€PCR) followâ€up studies on recovered patients to assess possible development of reinfections and reâ€positivity. METHODS: During a 6â€month period, 202 PCRâ€confirmed recovering COVIDâ€19 patients entered this study. Followâ€up RTâ€PCR tests and symptom assessment were performed 1
Document: BACKGROUND: Possibility of reinfection with SARSâ€CoVâ€2 changes our view on herd immunity and vaccination and can impact worldwide quarantine policies. We performed realâ€time polymerase chain reaction (RTâ€PCR) followâ€up studies on recovered patients to assess possible development of reinfections and reâ€positivity. METHODS: During a 6â€month period, 202 PCRâ€confirmed recovering COVIDâ€19 patients entered this study. Followâ€up RTâ€PCR tests and symptom assessment were performed 1 month after the initial positive results. Patients who tested negative were tested again 1 and 3 months later. The serum IgG and IgM levels were measured in the last followâ€up session. RESULTS: In the first two followâ€up sessions, 82 patients continued their participation, of which four patients tested positive. In the second followâ€up 44 patients participated, three of whom tested positive. None of the patients who tested positive in the first and second followâ€up session were symptomatic. In the last session, 32 patients were tested and four patients were positive, three of them were mildly symptomatic and all of them were positive for IgG. CONCLUSIONS: A positive RTâ€PCR in a recovering patient may represent reinfection. While we did not have the resources to prove reinfection by genetic sequencing of the infective viruses, we believe presence of mild symptoms in the three patients who tested positive over 100 days after becoming asymptomatic, can be diagnosed as reinfection. The immune response developed during the first episode of infection (e.g., IgG or Tâ€cell mediated responses that were not measured in our study) may have abated the symptoms of the reinfection, without providing complete protection.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date