Selected article for: "acceptance rate and proposal distribution"

Author: Lloyd A. C. Chapman; Simon E. F. Spencer; Timothy M. Pollington; Chris P. Jewell; Dinesh Mondal; Jorge Alvar; T. Deirdre Hollingsworth; Mary M. Cameron; Caryn Bern; Graham F. Medley
Title: Inferring transmission trees to guide targeting of interventions against visceral leishmaniasis and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis
  • Document date: 2020_2_25
  • ID: nqn1qzcu_63
    Snippet: It has been shown that N (k , 2.38 2 /n -), where is the covariance matrix of the posterior distribution, is the optimal 453 proposal distribution for rapid convergence and e cient mixing of the MCMC chain for symmetric product-form posterior 454 distributions as nae OE, and leads to an acceptance rate of 23.4% (38, 39) . This corresponds to a scaling of c k = 1 in Eq. (23)......
    Document: It has been shown that N (k , 2.38 2 /n -), where is the covariance matrix of the posterior distribution, is the optimal 453 proposal distribution for rapid convergence and e cient mixing of the MCMC chain for symmetric product-form posterior 454 distributions as nae OE, and leads to an acceptance rate of 23.4% (38, 39) . This corresponds to a scaling of c k = 1 in Eq. (23).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acceptance rate and MCMC chain: 1
    • acceptance rate and posterior distribution: 1, 2
    • acceptance rate and proposal distribution: 1, 2
    • covariance matrix and MCMC chain: 1
    • covariance matrix and posterior distribution: 1, 2, 3
    • covariance matrix and proposal distribution: 1, 2
    • MCMC chain and posterior distribution: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • MCMC chain and proposal distribution: 1, 2
    • posterior distribution and proposal distribution: 1, 2