Selected article for: "emergency respond and health care"

Author: Crupi, Robert S.; Di John, David; Mangubat, Peter Michael; Asnis, Deborah; Devera, Jaime; Maguire, Paul; Palevsky, Sheila L.
Title: Linking Emergency Preparedness and Health Care Worker Vaccination Against Influenza: A Novel Approach
  • Cord-id: u61m4x9l
  • Document date: 2016_11_16
  • ID: u61m4x9l
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) can acquire and transmit influenza to their patients and coworkers, even while asymptomatic. The U.S. Healthy People 2010 initiative set a national goal of 60% coverage for HCW influenza vaccination by 2010. Yet vaccination rates remain low. In the 2008–2009 influenza season, Flushing Hospital Medical Center (FHMC; New York) adopted a “push/pull” point-of-dispensing (POD) vaccination model that was derived from emergency preparedness planning for mass
    Document: BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) can acquire and transmit influenza to their patients and coworkers, even while asymptomatic. The U.S. Healthy People 2010 initiative set a national goal of 60% coverage for HCW influenza vaccination by 2010. Yet vaccination rates remain low. In the 2008–2009 influenza season, Flushing Hospital Medical Center (FHMC; New York) adopted a “push/pull” point-of-dispensing (POD) vaccination model that was derived from emergency preparedness planning for mass vaccination and/or prophylaxis to respond to an infectious disease outbreak, whether occurring naturally or due to bioterrorism. LAUNCH OF THE HCW VACCINATION PROGRAM: In mid-September 2008, a two-week HCW vaccination program was launched using a sequential POD approach. In Push POD, teams assigned to specific patient units educated all HCWs about influenza vaccination and offered on-site vaccination; vaccinated HCWs received a 2009 identification (ID) validation sticker. In Pull POD, HCWs could enter the hospital only through one entrance; all other employee entrances were “locked down.” A 2009 ID validation sticker was required for entry and to punch in for duty. Employees without the new validation sticker were directed to a nearby vaccination team. After the Push/Pull POD was completed, the employee vaccination drive at FHMC was continued for the remainder of the influenza season by the Employee Health Service. RESULTS: Using this model, in two days 72% of the employees were reached, with 54% of those reached accepting vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: This model provides a novel approach for institutions to improve their HCW influenza vaccination rates within a limited period through exercising emergency preparedness plans for infectious disease outbreaks.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accept vaccination and low vaccination rate: 1
    • acceptance rate and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acceptance rate and low vaccination rate: 1, 2
    • activity monitor and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additional hcw: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lock period: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown phase: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • acute respiratory syndrome and long additional: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low remain: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low vaccination rate: 1