Author: Richard, A.; Wisniak, A.; Perez-Saez, J.; Garrison-Desany, H.; Petrovic, D.; Piumatti, G.; Baysson, H.; Picazio, A.; Pennacchio, F.; De Ridder, D.; Chappuis, F.; Vuilleumier, N.; Low, N.; Hurst, S.; Eckerle, I.; Flahault, A.; Kaiser, L.; Azman, A. S.; Guessous, I.; Stringhini, S.; group, SEROCOV-POP study
Title: Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies, risk factors for infection and associated symptoms in Geneva, Switzerland: a population-based study Cord-id: xqr9lne1 Document date: 2020_12_18
ID: xqr9lne1
Snippet: Background: Population-based serological surveys provide a means for assessing the immunologic landscape of a community, without the biases related to health-seeking behaviors and testing practices typically associated with rt-PCR testing. This study assesses SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence over the first epidemic wave in Canton Geneva, Switzerland, as well as biological and socio-economic risk factors for infection and symptoms associated with IgG seropositivity. Methods and findings: Between April 6
Document: Background: Population-based serological surveys provide a means for assessing the immunologic landscape of a community, without the biases related to health-seeking behaviors and testing practices typically associated with rt-PCR testing. This study assesses SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence over the first epidemic wave in Canton Geneva, Switzerland, as well as biological and socio-economic risk factors for infection and symptoms associated with IgG seropositivity. Methods and findings: Between April 6 and June 30, 2020, former participants of a yearly representative cross-sectional survey of the 20-75-year-old population of the canton of Geneva were invited to participate in a seroprevalence study, along with household members five years and older. We collected blood and tested it for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins G (IgG). Questionnaires were self-administered. We estimated seroprevalence with a Bayesian model accounting for test performance and sampling design. We included 8344 participants (53.5% women, mean age 46.9 years). The population-level seroprevalence over the 12-week study period was 7.8 % (95% Credible Interval (CrI) 6.8-8.9), accounting for sex, age and household random effects. Seroprevalence was highest among 18-49 year olds (9.5%, 95%CrI 8.1-10.9), with young children (5-9 years) and those >65 years having significantly lower seroprevalence (4.3% and 4.7-5.4% respectively). Men were more likely to be seropositive than women (relative risk 1.2, 95%CrI 1.1-1.4). Odds of seropositivity were reduced for female retirees (0.46, 95%CI 0.23-0.93) and unemployed men (0.35, 95%CI 0.13-1.0) compared to employed individuals, and for current smokers (0.36, 95%CI 0.23-0.55) compared to never-smokers. We found no significant association between occupation, level of education, neighborhood income and the risk of being seropositive. Symptoms most strongly associated with seropositivity were anosmia/dysgeusia, loss of appetite, fever, fatigue and myalgia and/or arthralgia. Thirteen percent of seropositive participants reported no symptoms. Conclusions: Our results confirm a low population seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after the first wave in Geneva, a region hard hit by the COVID-19 pandemic. Socioeconomic factors were not associated with seropositivity in this sample. The elderly and young children were less frequently seropositive, though it is not clear how biology and behaviors shape these differences. These specificities should be considered when assessing the need for targeted public health measures.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abdominal pain and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- abdominal pain and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- abdominal pain and long covid: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- abdominal pain and low number: 1
- adjusted proportion and logistic model: 1, 2
- adjusted proportion and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- adjusted proportion and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- logistic model and long covid: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- logistic model and long covid prevalence: 1
- logistic model and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- logistic model and low seroprevalence: 1
- logistic regression and long covid: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression and long covid prevalence: 1
- logistic regression and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- logistic regression and low relative risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- logistic regression and low seroprevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4
- logistic regression model and long covid: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- logistic regression model and low number: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression model and low seroprevalence: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date