Author: Poggenborg, René Panduro; Madsen, Ole Rintek; Dreyer, Lene; Bukh, Gunhild; Hansen, Annette
Title: Patient-controlled outpatient follow-up on demand for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 2-year randomized controlled trial Cord-id: uk1lufzv Document date: 2021_3_6
ID: uk1lufzv
Snippet: INTRODUCTION: Scheduled routine visits in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be in a stable period without active disease. Consequently, there is a demand for developing outpatient control procedures which cater to the needs of the individual patient. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare a patient-controlled outpatient follow-up system, Open Outpatient Clinic Programme (OOCP), with traditional scheduled routine follow-up (TSRF) regarding patient satisfaction and disease activity marker
Document: INTRODUCTION: Scheduled routine visits in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be in a stable period without active disease. Consequently, there is a demand for developing outpatient control procedures which cater to the needs of the individual patient. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare a patient-controlled outpatient follow-up system, Open Outpatient Clinic Programme (OOCP), with traditional scheduled routine follow-up (TSRF) regarding patient satisfaction and disease activity markers in RA patients. METHOD: In a 2-year randomized controlled trial, RA patients were allocated to OOCP or TSRF. OOCP patients had no scheduled appointments but were allowed acute appointments with their rheumatologist and had access to nurse-led consultations and a telephone helpline. Appointments for the TSRF group were scheduled according to routine procedures (clinical parameters: DAS-28, C-reactive protein, VAS pain, tender and swollen joint count, HAQ-DI and radiographs; psychological parameters: VAS patient satisfaction and EQ-5D). RESULTS: Of 282 patients, 239 completed the study (OOCP/TSRF characteristics: age 61.4 ± 10.5/60.9 ± 12.2 years, females 77/74%, ACPA positive 66/65%). At years 1 and 2, OCCP had fewer visits (year 2: 2.6 ± 1.6 vs. 3.5 ± 2; p < 0.0005) but more phone calls (year 2: 0.7 ± 1.4 vs. 0.1 ± 0.3; p < 0.0005) compared to TSRF. OOCP was comparable to TSRF regarding clinical and psychological outcome measures, and no radiographic progression was observed. CONCLUSIONS: OOCP was associated with significantly fewer visits but with more phone calls to the nurse and was comparable with TSGentofte University HospitalRF regarding clinical, psychological and radiographic outcomes. Thus, the organization of outpatient care according to OOCP may be applied to strengthen patient-centred care in patients with RA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (July 20, 2020): NCT04476875 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10067-021-05674-y.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- access approach and address need: 1
- access approach and low disease: 1
- active disease and acute control: 1, 2, 3
- active disease and address need: 1
- active disease and low disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- active disease and low disease activity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- activity score and low disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- activity score and low disease activity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- acute access and address need: 1
- address need and low disease: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date