Selected article for: "detection rate and emergency hospital"

Author: Wieland, Shannon C; Brownstein, John S; Berger, Bonnie; Mandl, Kenneth D
Title: Automated real time constant-specificity surveillance for disease outbreaks
  • Cord-id: ue8yn570
  • Document date: 2007_6_13
  • ID: ue8yn570
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: For real time surveillance, detection of abnormal disease patterns is based on a difference between patterns observed, and those predicted by models of historical data. The usefulness of outbreak detection strategies depends on their specificity; the false alarm rate affects the interpretation of alarms. RESULTS: We evaluate the specificity of five traditional models: autoregressive, Serfling, trimmed seasonal, wavelet-based, and generalized linear. We apply each to 12 years of emerg
    Document: BACKGROUND: For real time surveillance, detection of abnormal disease patterns is based on a difference between patterns observed, and those predicted by models of historical data. The usefulness of outbreak detection strategies depends on their specificity; the false alarm rate affects the interpretation of alarms. RESULTS: We evaluate the specificity of five traditional models: autoregressive, Serfling, trimmed seasonal, wavelet-based, and generalized linear. We apply each to 12 years of emergency department visits for respiratory infection syndromes at a pediatric hospital, finding that the specificity of the five models was almost always a non-constant function of the day of the week, month, and year of the study (p < 0.05). We develop an outbreak detection method, called the expectation-variance model, based on generalized additive modeling to achieve a constant specificity by accounting for not only the expected number of visits, but also the variance of the number of visits. The expectation-variance model achieves constant specificity on all three time scales, as well as earlier detection and improved sensitivity compared to traditional methods in most circumstances. CONCLUSION: Modeling the variance of visit patterns enables real-time detection with known, constant specificity at all times. With constant specificity, public health practitioners can better interpret the alarms and better evaluate the cost-effectiveness of surveillance systems.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accurate estimate and acute respiratory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • accurate estimate and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • accurate estimate and additive model: 1
    • actual number and acute respiratory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • actual number and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • actual number and additive model: 1, 2
    • actual number and long term trend: 1
    • actual number and low frequency: 1, 2
    • actual specificity and acute respiratory: 1, 2
    • actual specificity and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory and additional patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
    • acute respiratory and additive model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • acute respiratory and long term trend: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory and low frequency: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additional patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additive model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low frequency: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • additional patient and low frequency: 1
    • long term trend and low frequency: 1