Selected article for: "additional 10 and admission rate"

Author: Sills, Marion R.; Hall, Matthew; Fieldston, Evan S.; Hain, Paul D.; Simon, Harold K.; Brogan, Thomas V.; Fagbuyi, Daniel B.; Mundorff, Michael B.; Shah, Samir S.
Title: Inpatient Capacity at Children’s Hospitals during Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Outbreak, United States
  • Cord-id: xz87wg74
  • Document date: 2011_9_25
  • ID: xz87wg74
    Snippet: Quantifying how close hospitals came to exhausting capacity during the outbreak of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 can help the health care system plan for more virulent pandemics. This ecologic analysis used emergency department (ED) and inpatient data from 34 US children's hospitals. For the 11-week pandemic (H1N1) 2009 period during fall 2009, inpatient occupancy reached 95%, which was lower than the 101% occupancy during the 2008-09 seasonal influenza period. Fewer than 1 additional admissi
    Document: Quantifying how close hospitals came to exhausting capacity during the outbreak of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 can help the health care system plan for more virulent pandemics. This ecologic analysis used emergency department (ED) and inpatient data from 34 US children's hospitals. For the 11-week pandemic (H1N1) 2009 period during fall 2009, inpatient occupancy reached 95%, which was lower than the 101% occupancy during the 2008-09 seasonal influenza period. Fewer than 1 additional admission per 10 inpatient beds would have caused hospitals to reach 100% occupancy. Using parameters based on historical precedent, we built 5 models projecting inpatient occupancy, varying the ED visit numbers and admission rate for influenza-related ED visits. The 5 scenarios projected median occupancy as high as 132% of capacity. The pandemic did not exhaust inpatient bed capacity, but a more virulent pandemic has the potential to push children's hospitals past their maximum inpatient capacity.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additional admission: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additional non: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additional patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additional resource: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory syndrome and admission iqr median: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • acute respiratory syndrome and admission rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and admission status: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and long hospitalization: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low threshold: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low virulence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • additional admission and admission rate: 1, 2, 3
    • additional admission and admission status: 1, 2
    • additional patient and admission rate: 1
    • admission rate and long hospitalization: 1, 2
    • admission rate and low threshold: 1