Selected article for: "commercial vaccine and high number"

Author: Jackson, Sarah E; Paul, Elise; Brown, Jamie; Steptoe, Andrew; Fancourt, Daisy
Title: Negative vaccine attitudes and intentions to vaccinate against Covid-19 in relation to smoking status: a population survey of UK adults
  • Cord-id: qwjpnsk5
  • Document date: 2021_3_5
  • ID: qwjpnsk5
    Snippet: INTRODUCTION: We examined differences in negative attitudes towards vaccines in general, and intentions to vaccinate against Covid-19 specifically, by smoking status in a large sample of adults in the UK. METHOD: Data were from 29,148 adults participating in the Covid-19 Social Study in September-October 2020. Linear regression analyses examined associations between smoking status (current/former/never) and four types of general negative vaccine attitudes: mistrust of vaccine benefit, worries ab
    Document: INTRODUCTION: We examined differences in negative attitudes towards vaccines in general, and intentions to vaccinate against Covid-19 specifically, by smoking status in a large sample of adults in the UK. METHOD: Data were from 29,148 adults participating in the Covid-19 Social Study in September-October 2020. Linear regression analyses examined associations between smoking status (current/former/never) and four types of general negative vaccine attitudes: mistrust of vaccine benefit, worries about unforeseen effects, concerns about commercial profiteering, and preference for natural immunity. Multinomial logistic regression examined associations between smoking status and uncertainty and unwillingness to be vaccinated for Covid-19. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics and diagnosed health conditions. RESULTS: Relative to never and former smokers, current smokers reported significantly greater mistrust of vaccine benefit, were more worried about unforeseen future effects, had greater concerns about commercial profiteering, and had a stronger preference for natural immunity (B(adj)s 0.16-0.36, p<0.001). Current smokers were more likely to be uncertain (27.6% vs. 22.7% of never smokers: RR(adj) 1.43 [95%CI 1.31-1.56]; vs. 19.3% of former smokers: RR(adj) 1.55 [1.41-1.73]) or unwilling (21.5% vs. 11.6% of never smokers: RR(adj) 2.12 [1.91-2.34]; vs. 14.7% of former smokers: RR(adj) 1.53 [1.37-1.71]) to receive a Covid-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Current smokers hold more negative attitudes towards vaccines in general, and are more likely to be undecided or unwilling to vaccinate against Covid-19, compared with never and former smokers. With a disproportionately high number of smokers belonging to socially clustered and disadvantaged socioeconomic groups, lower vaccine uptake in this group could also exacerbate health inequalities. IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that without intervention, smokers will be less likely than non-smokers to take up the offer of a Covid-19 vaccine when offered. Targeted policy action may be required to ensure low uptake of Covid-19 vaccination programmes does not compound health inequalities between smokers and non-smokers.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absence presence and low certainty: 1
    • absence presence and low certainty evidence: 1
    • absence presence and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • absence presence and low income background: 1
    • absence presence and low uptake: 1
    • absence presence and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • abuse domestic violence and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression and low certainty evidence: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and low income background: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • logistic regression and low uptake: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • logistic regression and low vaccine: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and low vaccine group: 1, 2