Author: Chaudhary, Mohita; Gastli, Mohamed Sadok; Nassar, Lobna; Karray, Fakhri
Title: Deep Learning Approaches for Forecasting Strawberry Yields and Prices Using Satellite Images and Station-Based Soil Parameters Cord-id: wb0p4gb7 Document date: 2021_2_17
ID: wb0p4gb7
Snippet: Computational tools for forecasting yields and prices for fresh produce have been based on traditional machine learning approaches or time series modelling. We propose here an alternate approach based on deep learning algorithms for forecasting strawberry yields and prices in Santa Barbara county, California. Building the proposed forecasting model comprises three stages: first, the station-based ensemble model (ATT-CNN-LSTM-SeriesNet_Ens) with its compound deep learning components, SeriesNet wi
Document: Computational tools for forecasting yields and prices for fresh produce have been based on traditional machine learning approaches or time series modelling. We propose here an alternate approach based on deep learning algorithms for forecasting strawberry yields and prices in Santa Barbara county, California. Building the proposed forecasting model comprises three stages: first, the station-based ensemble model (ATT-CNN-LSTM-SeriesNet_Ens) with its compound deep learning components, SeriesNet with Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Convolutional Neural Network LSTM with Attention layer (Att-CNN-LSTM), are trained and tested using the station-based soil temperature and moisture data of SantaBarbara as input and the corresponding strawberry yields or prices as output. Secondly, the remote sensing ensemble model (SIM_CNN-LSTM_Ens), which is an ensemble model of Convolutional NeuralNetwork LSTM (CNN-LSTM) models, is trained and tested using satellite images of the same county as input mapped to the same yields and prices as output. These two ensembles forecast strawberry yields and prices with minimal forecasting errors and highest model correlation for five weeks ahead forecasts.Finally, the forecasts of these two models are ensembled to have a final forecasted value for yields and prices by introducing a voting ensemble. Based on an aggregated performance measure (AGM), it is found that this voting ensemble not only enhances the forecasting performance by 5% compared to its best performing component model but also outperforms the Deep Learning (DL) ensemble model found in literature by 33% for forecasting yields and 21% for forecasting prices
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- long lstm short term memory networks and lstm model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- long lstm short term memory networks and lstm network: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- long lstm short term memory networks and lstm short term memory networks: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51
- long lstm short term memory networks and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- lstm cnn convolutional neural network and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4
- lstm cnn convolutional neural network and mae mean absolute error: 1
- lstm model and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
- lstm model and mae mean absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- lstm network and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
- lstm network and mae mean absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- lstm random forest and machine learning: 1
- lstm short term memory networks and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- lstm similar and machine learning: 1
- machine learning and mae mean absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- machine learning and mae measure: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date