Selected article for: "glass lesion and non pneumonia"

Author: Zhang, Bo; Wang, Xia; Tian, Xiaoyan; Zhao, Xiaoying; Liu, Bin; Wu, Xingwang; Du, Yaqing; Huang, Guoquan; Zhang, Qing
Title: Differences and prediction of imaging characteristics of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia: A multicenter study
  • Cord-id: zejil78m
  • Document date: 2020_10_16
  • ID: zejil78m
    Snippet: To study the differences in imaging characteristics and prediction of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia through chest CT. Chest CT data of 128 cases of COVID-19 and 47 cases of non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia confirmed by several hospitals were retrospectively collected, the imaging performance was evaluated and recorded, different imaging features were statistically analyzed, and a prediction model and independent predicted imaging features were obtained by multivariable analysis. COVID-19
    Document: To study the differences in imaging characteristics and prediction of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia through chest CT. Chest CT data of 128 cases of COVID-19 and 47 cases of non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia confirmed by several hospitals were retrospectively collected, the imaging performance was evaluated and recorded, different imaging features were statistically analyzed, and a prediction model and independent predicted imaging features were obtained by multivariable analysis. COVID-19 was more likely than non-COVID-19 pneumonia to have a high-grade ground glass opacities (P = .01), extensive lesion distribution (P < .001), mixed lesions of varying sizes (27.7% vs 57.0%, P = .001), subpleural prominence (23.4% vs 86.7%, P < .001), and lower lobe prominence (48.9% vs 82.0%, P < .001). However, peribronchial interstitial thickening was more likely to occur in non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia (36.2% vs 19.5%, P = .022). The statistically significant differences from multivariable analysis were the degree of ground glass opacities (P = .001), lesion distribution (P = .045), lesion size (P = .020), subpleural prominence (P < .001), and lower lobe prominence (P = .041). The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 94.5% and 76.6%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.91. The imaging characteristics of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia are different, and the prediction model can further improve the specificity of chest CT diagnosis.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accurate diagnosis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • accurate diagnosis and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accurate timely and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • accurate timely and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • accurate timely diagnosis and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • accurate timely diagnosis and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • acute respiratory respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • acute respiratory respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory respiratory distress syndrome and lung window: 1
    • lobe involved and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • lobe involved and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • logistic regression and lung window: 1, 2
    • logistic regression establish and lung window: 1