Selected article for: "azithromycin hydroxychloroquine and care standard"

Author: Cegolon, L.; Einollahi, B.; Imanizadeh, S.; Rezapour, M.; Javanbakht, M.; Nikpouraghdam, M.; Abolghasemi, H.; Mastrangelo, G.
Title: On whether therapeutic plasma exchange is an effective cure for severe/critical COVID-19 pneumonia
  • Cord-id: v32lowam
  • Document date: 2021_4_20
  • ID: v32lowam
    Snippet: There is a risk of novel mutations of SARS-CoV-2 that render COVID-19 resistant to most of the therapies including antiviral drugs. The evidence around the application of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for the management of critically ill COVID-19 patients is still provisional and further investigations are needed to confirm its eventual beneficial effects. We therefore carried out a single-centered retrospective observational non-placebo-controlled trial enrolling 73 inpatients from Baqiyata
    Document: There is a risk of novel mutations of SARS-CoV-2 that render COVID-19 resistant to most of the therapies including antiviral drugs. The evidence around the application of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for the management of critically ill COVID-19 patients is still provisional and further investigations are needed to confirm its eventual beneficial effects. We therefore carried out a single-centered retrospective observational non-placebo-controlled trial enrolling 73 inpatients from Baqiyatallah Hospital in Tehran (Iran) with diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal swabs and high-resolution computerized tomography chest scan. These patients were broken down into two groups: Group 1 (30 patients) receiving standard of care (corticosteroids, ceftriaxone, azithromycin, pantoprazole, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir); and Group 2 (43 patients) receiving the above regimen plus TPE (replacing 2 liter of patients plasma by a solution, 50% of normal plasma and 50% of albumin at 5%) administered according to various time schedules. The follow-up time was 30 days and all cause mortality was the endpoint. Deaths were 6 (14%) in Group 2 and 14 (47%) in Group 1. However, different harmful risk factors prevailed among patients not receiving TPE rather than being equally split between the intervention and control group. We used an algorithm of Structural Equation Modeling (of STATA) to summarize a large pool of potential confounders into a single score (called with the descriptive name Sseverity). Disease severity was significantly (Wilkinson rank sum test p-value=0.0000) lower among COVID-19 patients undergoing TPE (median: -2.82; range: -5.18; 7.96) as compared to those non receiving TPE (median: -1.35; range: -3.89; 8.84), confirming that treatment assignment involved a selection bias of patients according to the severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission. The adjustment for confounding was carried out using severity as covariate in Cox regression models. The univariate Hazard Ratio (HR) of 0.68 (95%CI: 0.26; 1.80; p=0.441) for TPE turned to 1.19 (95%CI: 0.43; 3.29; p=0.741) after adjusting for severity. Thus, the lower mortality observed among patients receiving TPE was due to a lower severity of COVID-19 rather than TPE effects. Keywords: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), COVID-19, Clinical and laboratory indexes, Cytokine storm.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • lopinavir ritonavir and low severity: 1, 2
    • lopinavir ritonavir hydroxychloroquine and low mortality: 1, 2, 3
    • lopinavir ritonavir hydroxychloroquine and low severity: 1