Selected article for: "age group and model performance"

Author: Singhal, Lakshya; Garg, Yash; Yang, Philip; Tabaie, Azade; Wong, A. Ian; Mohammed, Akram; Chinthala, Lokesh; Kadaria, Dipen; Sodhi, Amik; Holder, Andre L.; Esper, Annette; Blum, James M.; Davis, Robert L.; Clifford, Gari D.; Martin, Greg S.; Kamaleswaran, Rishikesan
Title: eARDS: A multi-center validation of an interpretable machine learning algorithm of early onset Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) among critically ill adults with COVID-19
  • Cord-id: rhrfj4wq
  • Document date: 2021_9_24
  • ID: rhrfj4wq
    Snippet: We present an interpretable machine learning algorithm called ‘eARDS’ for predicting ARDS in an ICU population comprising COVID-19 patients, up to 12-hours before satisfying the Berlin clinical criteria. The analysis was conducted on data collected from the Intensive care units (ICU) at Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA and University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN and the Cerner(®) Health Facts Deidentified Database, a multi-site COVID-19 EMR database. The participants in the
    Document: We present an interpretable machine learning algorithm called ‘eARDS’ for predicting ARDS in an ICU population comprising COVID-19 patients, up to 12-hours before satisfying the Berlin clinical criteria. The analysis was conducted on data collected from the Intensive care units (ICU) at Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA and University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN and the Cerner(®) Health Facts Deidentified Database, a multi-site COVID-19 EMR database. The participants in the analysis consisted of adults over 18 years of age. Clinical data from 35,804 patients who developed ARDS and controls were used to generate predictive models that identify risk for ARDS onset up to 12-hours before satisfying the Berlin criteria. We identified salient features from the electronic medical record that predicted respiratory failure among this population. The machine learning algorithm which provided the best performance exhibited AUROC of 0.89 (95% CI = 0.88–0.90), sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI = 0.75–0.78), specificity 0.85 (95% CI = 085–0.86). Validation performance across two separate health systems (comprising 899 COVID-19 patients) exhibited AUROC of 0.82 (0.81–0.83) and 0.89 (0.87, 0.90). Important features for prediction of ARDS included minimum oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), standard deviation of the systolic blood pressure (SBP), O(2) flow, and maximum respiratory rate over an observational window of 16-hours. Analyzing the performance of the model across various cohorts indicates that the model performed best among a younger age group (18–40) (AUROC = 0.93 [0.92–0.94]), compared to an older age group (80+) (AUROC = 0.81 [0.81–0.82]). The model performance was comparable on both male and female groups, but performed significantly better on the severe ARDS group compared to the mild and moderate groups. The eARDS system demonstrated robust performance for predicting COVID19 patients who developed ARDS at least 12-hours before the Berlin clinical criteria, across two independent health systems.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accurate prediction and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • accurate prediction and lung injury: 1
    • accurate prediction and lung volume: 1, 2
    • actual onset and logistic regression: 1
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and additional time: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low elastance: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low elastance high: 1
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung injury attenuate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung injury avoid: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung injury prediction score: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung injury prevent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung protective: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung protective ventilation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung volume: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome respiratory failure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome respiratory failure and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25