Author: Tanujit Chakraborty; Indrajit Ghosh
Title: Real-time forecasts and risk assessment of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) cases: A data-driven analysis Document date: 2020_4_14
ID: ba6mdgq3_32
Snippet: Five time series COVID-19 datasets for Canada, France, India, South Korea, and the UK are considered for training the proposed model and the component models. The datasets are nonlinear, nonstationary, and non-gaussian in nature. We have used root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), to evaluate the predictive performance of the models used in this study [17] . Since the number of data points in both the datasets is limited thus g.....
Document: Five time series COVID-19 datasets for Canada, France, India, South Korea, and the UK are considered for training the proposed model and the component models. The datasets are nonlinear, nonstationary, and non-gaussian in nature. We have used root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), to evaluate the predictive performance of the models used in this study [17] . Since the number of data points in both the datasets is limited thus going for advanced deep learning techniques will simply over-fit the datasets [14] . We start the experimental evaluation for all the five datasets with the classical ARIMA(p,d,q) using 'forecast' [16] statistical package in R software. To fit an ARIMA model, we first specify the parameters of the model. Using ACF plot and PACF plot (See Table 1 ), we can decide the value of the parameters of the model. We have also performed unit root tests for stationarity check and all the datasets were found nonstationary. The 'best' fitted ARIMA model is chosen using AIC and BIC values for each training dataset. The fitted ARIMA models for five datasets are as follows: ARIMA(1,2,1) for India, ARIMA(1,1,2) for Canada, ARIMA(0,1,1) for France, ARIMA(2,1,0) for South Korea, and ARIMA(2,2,2) for the UK. We employ a pre-defined Box-Cox transformation set to λ = 0 to ensure the forecast values stay positive. As the ARIMA model is fitted, forecasts are generated for 10-time steps (5 April 2020 to 14 April 2020) for all the five datasets. We also compute training data predicted values and calculate the residual errors. Plots for the residual series are given in Figure 1 .
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- positive stay and RMSE root mean square error: 1
- positive stay and root mean: 1
- positive stay and root mean square error: 1
- positive stay and square error: 1
- predictive performance and propose model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- predictive performance and RMSE root mean square error: 1
- predictive performance and root mean: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- predictive performance and root mean square error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- predictive performance and square error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- predictive performance and time series: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- predictive performance and training dataset: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- predictive performance and value predict: 1, 2
- propose model and residual series: 1
- propose model and RMSE root mean square error: 1, 2
- propose model and root mean: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- propose model and root mean square error: 1, 2, 3, 4
- time series and training dataset: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- time series and unit root test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- time series and value predict: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date