Author: Verma, Bhupendra Kumar; Verma, Mamta; Verma, Vikash Kumar; Abdullah, Rifah B.; Nath, Dilip C.; Khan, Hafiz T. A.; Verma, Anita; Vishwakarma, Ramesh K.; Verma, Vivek
Title: Global lockdown: An effective safeguard in responding to the threat of COVIDâ€19 Cord-id: rmy14qzq Document date: 2020_9_24
ID: rmy14qzq
Snippet: RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The recent outbreak of coronavirus (COVIDâ€19) has infected around 1 560 000 individuals till 10 April 2020, which has resulted in 95 000 deaths globally. While no vaccine or antiâ€viral drugs for COVIDâ€19 are available, lockdown acts as a protective public health measures to reduce human interaction and lower transmission. The study aims to explore the impact of delayed planning or lack of planning for the lockdown and inadequate implementation of the lockdo
Document: RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The recent outbreak of coronavirus (COVIDâ€19) has infected around 1 560 000 individuals till 10 April 2020, which has resulted in 95 000 deaths globally. While no vaccine or antiâ€viral drugs for COVIDâ€19 are available, lockdown acts as a protective public health measures to reduce human interaction and lower transmission. The study aims to explore the impact of delayed planning or lack of planning for the lockdown and inadequate implementation of the lockdown, on the transmission rate of COVIDâ€19. METHOD: Epidemiological data on the incidence and mortality of COVIDâ€19 cases as reported by public health authorities were accessed from six countries based on total number of infected cases, namely, United States and Italy (more than 100 000 cases); United Kingdom, and France (50 000â€100 000 cases), and India and Russia (6000â€10 000 cases). The Bayesian inferential technique was used to observe the changes (three points) in pattern of number of cases on different duration of exposure (in days) in these selected countries 1 month after World Health Organization (WHO) declaration about COVIDâ€19 as a global pandemic. RESULTS: On comparing the pattern of transmission rates observed in these six countries at posterior estimated change points, it is found that partial implementation of lockdown (in the United States), delayed planning in lockdown (Russia, United Kingdom, and France), and inadequate implementation of the lockdown (in India and Italy) were responsible to the spread of infections. CONCLUSIONS: In order to control the spreading of COVIDâ€19, like other national and international laws, lockdown must be implemented and enforced. It is suggested that onâ€time or adequate implementation of lockdown is a step towards social distancing and to control the spread of this pandemic.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- activity compliance and lockdown impact: 1, 2
- activity compliance and lockdown time: 1
- acute respiratory and lockdown delay: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute respiratory and lockdown impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory and lockdown implementation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- acute respiratory and lockdown time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date