Author: Català , A.; Muñozâ€Santos, C.; Galvánâ€Casas, C.; Roncero Riesco, M.; Revilla Nebreda, D.; Soláâ€Truyols, A.; Giavedoni, P.; Llamasâ€Velasco, M.; Gonzálezâ€Cruz, C.; Cubiró, X.; RuÃzâ€Villaverde, R.; Gómezâ€Armayones, S.; Gil Mateo, M.P.; Pesqué, D.; Marcantonio, O.; Fernándezâ€Nieto, D.; RomanÃ, J.; Iglesias Pena, N.; Carnero Gonzalez, L.; Tercedorâ€Sanchez, J.; Carretero, G.; Masatâ€Ticó, T.; RodrÃguezâ€Jiménez, P.; Gimenezâ€Arnau, A.M.; Utreraâ€Busquets, M.; Vargas Laguna, E.; Angulo Menéndez, A.G.; San Juan Lasser, E.; Iglesiasâ€Sancho, M.; Alonso Naranjo, L.; Hiltun, I.; Cutillas Marco, E.; Polimon Olabarrieta, I.; Marinero Escobedo, S.; GarcÃaâ€Navarro, X.; Calderón Gutiérrez, M.J.; Baezaâ€Hernández, G.; Bou Camps, L.; Toledoâ€Pastrana, T.; Guilabert, A.
Title: Cutaneous reactions after SARSâ€COVâ€2 vaccination: A crossâ€sectional Spanish nationwide study of 405 cases Cord-id: rpkhu9iw Document date: 2021_7_13
ID: rpkhu9iw
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Cutaneous reactions after SARSâ€CoVâ€2 vaccines are poorly characterized. Objectives: The primary objective was to describe and classify cutaneous reactions after SARSâ€CoVâ€2 vaccination. METHODS: A nationwide Spanish crossâ€sectional study was conducted. We included patients with cutaneous reactions within 21 days after any dose of the approved vaccines at the time of the study. After a faceâ€toâ€face visit with a dermatologist, information on cutaneous reactions was collect
Document: BACKGROUND: Cutaneous reactions after SARSâ€CoVâ€2 vaccines are poorly characterized. Objectives: The primary objective was to describe and classify cutaneous reactions after SARSâ€CoVâ€2 vaccination. METHODS: A nationwide Spanish crossâ€sectional study was conducted. We included patients with cutaneous reactions within 21 days after any dose of the approved vaccines at the time of the study. After a faceâ€toâ€face visit with a dermatologist, information on cutaneous reactions was collected through an online professional survey and clinical photographs were sent by email. Investigators searched for consensus on clinical patterns and classification. RESULTS: From February 16 to May 15, 2021, we collected 405 reactions after vaccination with the BNT162b2 (Pfizerâ€BioNTech, 40.2%), mRNAâ€1273 (Moderna, 36.3%) and AZD1222 (AstraZeneca, 23.5%) vaccines. The mean patient age was 50.7 years and 80.2% were female. Cutaneous reactions were classified as: injectionâ€site (COVIDâ€ARM, 32.1%), urticaria (14.6%), morbilliform (8.9%), papulovesicular (6.4%), pityriasis roseaâ€like (4.9%) and purpuric (4%) reactions. Varicella zoster and herpes simplex virus reactivations accounted for 13.8% of reactions. The COVIDâ€ARM was almost exclusive to women (95.4%). The most reported reaction in each vaccine group were COVIDâ€ARM (mRNAâ€1273, Moderna, 61.9%), varicella zoster virus reactivation (BNT162b2, Pfizerâ€BioNTech, 17.2%), and urticaria (AZD1222, AstraZeneca, 21.1%). Most reactions to the mRNAâ€1273 (Moderna) vaccine were described in women (90.5%). Eighty reactions (21%) were classified as severe/very severe and 81% required treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous reactions after SARSâ€CoVâ€2 vaccination are heterogeneous. Most are mildâ€toâ€moderate and selfâ€limiting, although severe/very severe reactions are reported. Knowledge of these reactions during mass vaccination may help healthcare professionals and reassure patients.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date