Author: Zhang, Jing; Du, Hui-Min; Cheng, Ming-Xiang; He, Fa-Ming; Niu, Bai-Lin
Title: Role of international normalized ratio in nonpulmonary sepsis screening: An observational study Cord-id: rqsbm8zh Document date: 2021_9_6
ID: rqsbm8zh
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Currently, there is a lack of sepsis screening tools that can be widely used worldwide. Pulmonary sepsis can be of sufficient concern to physicians due to their noticeable symptoms, which usually rely less on screening tools. AIM: To investigate the efficiency of the international normalized ratio (INR) for the early rapid recognition of adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study. A total of 108 sepsis patients and 106 nonsepsis patients
Document: BACKGROUND: Currently, there is a lack of sepsis screening tools that can be widely used worldwide. Pulmonary sepsis can be of sufficient concern to physicians due to their noticeable symptoms, which usually rely less on screening tools. AIM: To investigate the efficiency of the international normalized ratio (INR) for the early rapid recognition of adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study. A total of 108 sepsis patients and 106 nonsepsis patients were enrolled according to relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. Commonly used clinical indicators, such as white blood cell, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), platelets (PLT), prothrombin time, INR, activated partial thromboplastin time, and quick Sequential “Sepsis-related†Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores were recorded within 24 h after admission. The diagnostic performances of these clinical indicators were analyzed and compared through multivariate logistic regression analysis, Spearman correlation, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The INR value of the sepsis group was significantly higher than that of the nonsepsis group. INR has superior diagnostic efficacy for sepsis, with an area under the curve value of 0.918, when those preexisting diseases which significantly affect coagulation function were excluded. The diagnostic efficacy of the INR was more significant than that of NLCR, PLT, and qSOFA (P < 0.05). Moreover, INR levels of 1.17, 1.20, and 1.22 could be used to categorize the relative risk of nonpulmonary infections sepsis into three categories: low, medium and high risk, respectively. CONCLUSION: The INR is a promising and easily available biomarker for diagnosis, and it can be used as one of the indicators for early screening of adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis. When its value is higher than the optimal cutoff value (1.22), high vigilance is required for adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abdominal effusion and liver disease: 1
- acute appendicitis and admission day: 1, 2
- acute appendicitis and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
- acute appendicitis and low sensitivity: 1
- acute appendicitis diagnosis and low sensitivity: 1
- acute physiology and admission day: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- acute physiology and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute physiology and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- acute physiology and low sensitivity: 1
- acute physiology and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- admission day and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- admission day and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- admission day and long term treatment: 1, 2, 3, 4
- admission day and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- admission day and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- liver disease and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- liver disease and long term treatment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- liver disease and low sensitivity: 1, 2
- liver disease and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date