Author: Cho, Yongwon; Hwang, Sung Ho; Oh, Yuâ€Whan; Ham, Byungâ€Joo; Kim, Min Ju; Park, Beom Jin
Title: Deep convolution neural networks to differentiate between COVIDâ€19 and other pulmonary abnormalities on chest radiographs: Evaluation using internal and external datasets Cord-id: y81mtvaq Document date: 2021_5_13
ID: y81mtvaq
Snippet: We aimed to evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in the classification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) disease using normal, pneumonia, and COVIDâ€19 chest radiographs (CXRs). First, we collected 9194 CXRs from open datasets and 58 from the Korea University Anam Hospital (KUAH). The number of normal, pneumonia, and COVIDâ€19 CXRs were 4580, 3884, and 730, respectively. The CXRs obtained from the open dataset were randomly assigned to the training, tuning, a
Document: We aimed to evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in the classification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) disease using normal, pneumonia, and COVIDâ€19 chest radiographs (CXRs). First, we collected 9194 CXRs from open datasets and 58 from the Korea University Anam Hospital (KUAH). The number of normal, pneumonia, and COVIDâ€19 CXRs were 4580, 3884, and 730, respectively. The CXRs obtained from the open dataset were randomly assigned to the training, tuning, and test sets in a 70:10:20 ratio. For external validation, the KUAH (20 normal, 20 pneumonia, and 18 COVIDâ€19) dataset, verified by radiologists using computed tomography, was used. Subsequently, transfer learning was conducted using DenseNet169, InceptionResNetV2, and Xception to identify COVIDâ€19 using open datasets (internal) and the KUAH dataset (external) with histogram matching. Gradientâ€weighted class activation mapping was used for the visualization of abnormal patterns in CXRs. The average AUC and accuracy of the multiscale and mixedâ€COVIDâ€19Net using three CNNs over five folds were (0.99 ± 0.01 and 92.94% ± 0.45%), (0.99 ± 0.01 and 93.12% ± 0.23%), and (0.99 ± 0.01 and 93.57% ± 0.29%), respectively, using the open datasets (internal). Furthermore, these values were (0.75 and 74.14%), (0.72 and 68.97%), and (0.77 and 68.97%), respectively, for the best model among the fivefold crossâ€validation with the KUAH dataset (external) using domain adaptation. The various stateâ€ofâ€theâ€art models trained on open datasets show satisfactory performance for clinical interpretation. Furthermore, the domain adaptation for external datasets was found to be important for detecting COVIDâ€19 as well as other diseases.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accurately disease and lung cancer: 1, 2
- accurately disease and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- accurately disease and lung opacity: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and adaptation method: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional center: 1, 2, 3
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional external validation: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional source: 1, 2, 3
- acute respiratory syndrome and adjacent block: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and local open: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and lung cancer: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- acute respiratory syndrome and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74
- acute respiratory syndrome and lung opacity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date