Author: Li, Yueping; Xie, Zhiwei; Lin, Weiyin; Cai, Weiping; Wen, Chunyan; Guan, Yujuan; Mo, Xiaoneng; Wang, Jian; Wang, Yaping; Peng, Ping; Chen, Xudan; Hong, Wenxin; Xiao, Guangming; Liu, Jinxin; Zhang, Lieguang; Hu, Fengyu; Li, Feng; Zhang, Fuchun; Deng, Xilong; Li, Linghua
Title: Efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir or arbidol in adult patients with mild/moderate COVID-19: an exploratory randomized controlled trial Cord-id: ytqjxzaa Document date: 2020_5_19
ID: ytqjxzaa
Snippet: Abstract Background Antiviral therapies against the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which has caused a global pandemic of respiratory illness called COVID-19, are still lacking. Methods Our study (NCT04252885, named ELACOI), was an exploratory randomized (2:2:1) controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or arbidol monotherapy for treating patients with mild/moderate COVID-19. Findings This study successfully enrolled 86 patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 w
Document: Abstract Background Antiviral therapies against the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which has caused a global pandemic of respiratory illness called COVID-19, are still lacking. Methods Our study (NCT04252885, named ELACOI), was an exploratory randomized (2:2:1) controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or arbidol monotherapy for treating patients with mild/moderate COVID-19. Findings This study successfully enrolled 86 patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 with 34 randomly assigned to receive LPV/r, 35 to arbidol and 17 with no antiviral medication as control. Baseline characteristics of the three groups were comparable. The primary endpoint, the rate of positive-to-negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid, was similar between groups (all P>0.05). There were no differences between groups in the secondary endpoints, the rates of antipyresis, cough alleviation, or improvement of chest CT at days 7 or 14 (all P>0.05). At day 7, eight (23.5%) patients in the LPV/r group, 3 (8.6%) in the arbidol group and 2(11.8%) in the control group showed a deterioration in clinical status from moderate to severe/critical (P =0.206). Overall, 12 (35.3%) patients in the LPV/r group and 5 (14.3%) in the arbidol group experienced adverse events during the follow-up period. No apparent adverse event occurred in the control group. Conclusions LPV/r or arbidol monotherapy present little benefit for improving the clinical outcome of patients hospitalized with mild/moderate COVID-19 over supportive care. Funding This study was supported by project 2018ZX10302103-002, 2017ZX10202102-003-004 and Infectious Disease Specialty of Guangzhou High-level Clinical Key Specialty (2019-2021).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absorption oral intake and liver malfunction: 1
- acute pancreatitis and liver disease: 1, 2, 3
- acute pancreatitis and long term prognosis: 1
- acute pancreatitis and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2
- liver disease and long term prognosis: 1
- liver disease and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- long term prognosis and lopinavir ritonavir: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date