Author: Nicholas G Davies; Petra Klepac; Yang Liu; Kiesha Prem; Mark Jit; Rosalind M Eggo
Title: Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics Document date: 2020_3_27
ID: 8f76vhyz_1
Snippet: . (b) Susceptibility by age for the three hypotheses. Age-specific values were estimated for hypothesis 2 and all ages had equal susceptibility for hypothesis 1 and 3. Susceptibility is measured as the probability of infection on contact with an infectious person. (c) Clinical fraction ( y i ) by age for the 3 hypotheses. Age-specific values were estimated for hypothesis 3 and all ages were equal for hypothesis 1 and 2. (d) Fitted contact multipl.....
Document: . (b) Susceptibility by age for the three hypotheses. Age-specific values were estimated for hypothesis 2 and all ages had equal susceptibility for hypothesis 1 and 3. Susceptibility is measured as the probability of infection on contact with an infectious person. (c) Clinical fraction ( y i ) by age for the 3 hypotheses. Age-specific values were estimated for hypothesis 3 and all ages were equal for hypothesis 1 and 2. (d) Fitted contact multipliers for holiday and restricted periods for each hypothesis showed an increase in non-school contacts beginning on January 12th (start of Lunar New Year) and a decrease in contacts following restrictions on January 23rd. (e) Estimated R 0 values under each hypothesis. The red barplot shows the inferred window of spillover of infection. (f) Incident reported cases (black), and modelled incidence of clinical cases for the three hypotheses as fitted to the cases reported by China Centers for Disease Control 1 with onset on or before February 1st, 2020. Line marks mean and shaded window is the 95% highest density interval (HDI). (g) Age distribution of cases by onset date as fitted to the age distributions reported by Li et al. 26 Data are shown in the hollow bars, and model predictions in filled bars, where the dot marks the mean posterior estimate. (h) Inferred distribution of subclinical cases by age under each hypothesis. Credible intervals on modelled values show the 95% HDIs; credible intervals on data for panels d-f show 95% HDIs for the proportion of cases in each age group.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- age distribution and case proportion: 1, 2, 3, 4
- age distribution and clinical case: 1, 2, 3
- age distribution and clinical fraction: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- age distribution and credible interval: 1
- age group and black case: 1
- age group and case age distribution: 1, 2, 3
- age group and case proportion: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- age group and clinical case: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- age group and clinical fraction: 1, 2
- age group and credible interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- age group and February 1st: 1
- age susceptibility and case age distribution: 1
- age susceptibility and clinical case: 1, 2
- age susceptibility and clinical fraction: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- age susceptibility and credible interval: 1, 2
- age susceptibility and equal susceptibility: 1
- black case and case proportion: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- black case and clinical case: 1, 2
- black case and credible interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date