Selected article for: "locally advanced and long course chemoradiation therapy"

Author: Sarkar, R. R.; Wu, A. J.; Reyngold, M.; Cuaron, J. J.; Zinovoy, M.; Hajj, C.; Pappou, E.; Segal, N.; Yaeger, R.; Wei, I. H.; Widmar, M.; Weiser, M.; Paty, P.; Cercek, A.; Smith, J. J.; Saltz, L.; Garcia-Aguilar, J.; Crane, C. H.; Romesser, P. B.
Title: Feasibility of Organ Preservation With Short Course Radiation Therapy as Part of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Cord-id: xx89jqxi
  • Document date: 2021_11_1
  • ID: xx89jqxi
    Snippet: Purpose/Objective(s) While long course chemoradiation therapy has been studied as part of a watch-and-wait (WW) strategy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, it is unclear whether short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) will be associated with similar rates of organ preservation. We hypothesized that a WW strategy to facilitate organ preservation with SCRT, as part of a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach during the COVID-19 pandemic, would be both safe and feasible. Materials/Me
    Document: Purpose/Objective(s) While long course chemoradiation therapy has been studied as part of a watch-and-wait (WW) strategy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, it is unclear whether short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) will be associated with similar rates of organ preservation. We hypothesized that a WW strategy to facilitate organ preservation with SCRT, as part of a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach during the COVID-19 pandemic, would be both safe and feasible. Materials/Methods From March to June of 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, per institutional policy, all patients undergoing radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with SCRT. After completion of SCRT-TNT, patients were clinically restaged by exam, endoscopy and MRI and the decision was made to manage the patient surgically or with a WW approach. The decision for WW or surgery was made by the surgeon in conjunction with patient consent. After IRB waiver was obtained, we reviewed consecutive patients treated during our SCRT mandate. The main outcome of interest was total mesorectal excision (TME)-free survival among patients eligible for WW after SCRT-TNT. Results Our cohort included 42 patients with a median age of 57 years (Interquartile Range [IQR] 48-67), 24 (57%) of whom were male. Median follow-up from end of SCRT-TNT was 7 months (IQR 6-8). The median tumor cranio-caudal size was 4.1 cm (IQR 3.3-5.2) with a median distance from the anal verge of 7 cm (IQR 5-9). The majority had cT3 (71%) or cN+ (74%) disease. Patients underwent a median of 14 weeks (IQR 13-15) of FOLFOX or CAPEOX chemotherapy, with 32 (76%) patients receiving chemotherapy prior to SCRT and 10 (24%) patients receiving chemotherapy after SCRT. The median time from completion of TNT to endoscopic restaging was 9 weeks (IQR 7-10). Nineteen (45%) patients were recommended to undergo surgical resection, of whom 17 went on to TME and 2 refused TME. Of the 15 patients with pathology available, 2 had a pCR (13%). Notably, one of these patients had a cCR at post-TNT endoscopy, but due to the presence of a stricture, WW was deemed unfeasible. Of the 23 patients managed by a WW strategy after SCRT-TNT completion, 19 had a clinical complete response (cCR), 3 had a near-CR, and 1 had an incomplete response. The 6-month TME-free survival was 85% for patients on WW. Four (17%) patients had a local regrowth at a median of 20 weeks (IQR 17-24), 3 of whom were salvaged with TME and 1 who declined surgery and opted for further surveillance. One of these patients had regrowth confirmed by biopsy, but had a pCR confirmed in the TME specimen. The 6-month TME- free survival of the entire cohort was 52%, and the combined pCR/6-month cCR was 52%. Conclusion Our data suggest WW after SCRT-TNT is feasible. Longer term follow-up is required to confirm the durability and oncologic safety of these results.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • admission date and low dose radiation: 1
    • admission date and lung involvement: 1, 2
    • admission date and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3
    • admission date rt receive and lopinavir ritonavir: 1
    • admission date rt receive and low dose radiation: 1
    • admission date rt receive and lung involvement: 1
    • admission date rt receive median time and lopinavir ritonavir: 1
    • admission date rt receive median time and low dose radiation: 1
    • admission date rt receive median time and lung involvement: 1
    • locally advanced and long course: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • locally advanced rectal cancer and long course: 1, 2, 3
    • long course and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3
    • long course and lymphocyte count: 1
    • long term follow and lopinavir ritonavir: 1
    • long term follow and lung involvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • long term follow and lung total: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • long term follow and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3
    • lopinavir ritonavir and lung involvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • lopinavir ritonavir and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10