Selected article for: "day negative stay and negative stay"

Author: English, W.; Habib Bedwani, N.; Smith, C.; Doganay, E.; Marsden, M.; Muse, S.; Mak, W. K.; Chana, M.; Eves, J.; Shatkar, V.
Title: Suspected appendicitis and COVID-19, a change in investigation and management—a multicentre cohort study
  • Cord-id: yqtbhdwh
  • Document date: 2020_11_9
  • ID: yqtbhdwh
    Snippet: PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has reformed global healthcare delivery. On 25 March 2020, Intercollegiate guidelines were published in the UK to promote safe surgical provision during the COVID-19 outbreak advocating non-operative management or avoidance of laparoscopy when surgery is essential. The effects of this on the investigation and management of appendicitis remain unknown. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, prospective, observational study from the start of the new guidelines to the 6
    Document: PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has reformed global healthcare delivery. On 25 March 2020, Intercollegiate guidelines were published in the UK to promote safe surgical provision during the COVID-19 outbreak advocating non-operative management or avoidance of laparoscopy when surgery is essential. The effects of this on the investigation and management of appendicitis remain unknown. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, prospective, observational study from the start of the new guidelines to the 6th of May 2020. We included all patients referred to surgical teams with suspected appendicitis. A recent historical cohort was identified for comparison. The primary outcome was the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of non-operative management in appendicitis. Secondary outcomes included imaging, negative appendicectomy rate (NAR), length of stay (LOS) and 30-day complications. RESULTS: A total of 63/164 (38%) patients compared to 79/191 (41%) were diagnosed with appendicitis before and after the guidelines were introduced (p = 0.589). CT scanning increased (71/164 vs 105/191; p = 0.033) while ultrasound scanning decreased (71/164 vs 62/191; p = 0.037). Appendicitis was more likely to be managed non-operatively (11/63 vs 51/79; p < 0.001) and, of those managed surgically, with an open approach (3/52 vs 26/28 p < 0.001). The NAR also reduced (5/52 vs 0/28; p = 0.157). LOS was shorter in non-operatively managed patients (1 day vs 3 days; p < 0.001) without a difference in complications (10/51 vs 4/28; p = 0.760). CONCLUSION: Introduction of the guidelines was associated with changes in practice. Despite these changes, short-term complications did not increase and LOS decreased. Questions remain on the longer-term complication rates in non-operatively managed patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-020-02023-6.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal ct and acute appendicitis patient: 1
    • abdominal ct and acute kidney injury: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • abdominal ct and long term outcome: 1, 2, 3
    • abdominal imaging and acute appendicitis: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • abdominal imaging and acute kidney injury: 1
    • abdominal imaging and long term outcome: 1
    • abdominal pain and acute appendicitis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • abdominal pain and acute appendicitis patient: 1
    • abdominal pain and acute appendicitis present: 1
    • abdominal pain and acute kidney injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • abdominal pain and admission date: 1
    • abdominal pain and long term outcome: 1, 2, 3
    • acute appendicitis and admission date: 1
    • acute appendicitis present and admission date: 1
    • acute kidney injury and admission date: 1, 2, 3
    • acute kidney injury and admission inflammatory marker: 1
    • acute kidney injury and admission record: 1
    • acute kidney injury and long term complication: 1
    • acute kidney injury and long term outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7