Author: Shinohara, Naohide; Sakaguchi, Jun; Kim, Hoon; Kagi, Naoki; Tatsu, Koichi; Mano, Hiroyuki; Iwasaki, Yuichi; Naito, Wataru
                    Title: Survey of air exchange rates and evaluation of airborne infection risk of COVID-19 on commuter trains  Cord-id: x9fhar2o  Document date: 2021_7_23
                    ID: x9fhar2o
                    
                    Snippet: To identify potential countermeasures for coronavirus disease (COVID-19), we determined the air exchange rates in stationary and moving train cars under various conditions in July, August, and December 2020 in Japan. When the doors were closed, the air exchange rates in both stationary and moving trains increased with increasing area of window-opening (0.23–0.78 /h at 0 m(2), windows closed to 2.1–10 /h at 2.86 m(2), fully open). The air exchange rates were one order of magnitude higher when
                    
                    
                    
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        
                            
                                Document: To identify potential countermeasures for coronavirus disease (COVID-19), we determined the air exchange rates in stationary and moving train cars under various conditions in July, August, and December 2020 in Japan. When the doors were closed, the air exchange rates in both stationary and moving trains increased with increasing area of window-opening (0.23–0.78 /h at 0 m(2), windows closed to 2.1–10 /h at 2.86 m(2), fully open). The air exchange rates were one order of magnitude higher when doors were open than when closed. With doors closed, the air exchange rates were higher when the centralized air conditioning (AC) and crossflow fan systems (fan) were on than when off. The air exchange rates in moving trains increased as train speed increased, from 10/h at 20 km/h to 42/h at 57 km/h. Air exchange rates did not differ significantly between empty cars and those filled with 230 mannequins representing commuters. The air exchange rates were lower during aboveground operation than during underground. Assuming that 30–300 passengers travel in a train car for 7–60 min and that the community infection rate is 0.0050%–0.30%, we estimated that commuters’ infection risk on trains was reduced by 91%–94% when all 12 windows were opened (to a height of 10 cm) and the AC/fan was on compared with that when windows were closed and the AC/fan was off.
 
  Search related documents: 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date