Author: Binda, Filippo; Galazzi, Alessandro; Marelli, Federica; Gambazza, Simone; Villa, Lucia; Vinci, Elisa; Adamini, Ileana; Laquintana, Dario
Title: Complications of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19: a cross-sectional study Cord-id: xl0zvilf Document date: 2021_6_1
ID: xl0zvilf
Snippet: OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of complications in patients with COVID-19 undergone prone positioning, focusing on the development of prone-related pressure ulcers. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in the hub COVID-19 center in Milan (Italy), between March and June 2020. All patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care unit on invasive mechanical ventilation and treated with prone positioning were included. Association between prone-related pressure ulcers and selected varia
Document: OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of complications in patients with COVID-19 undergone prone positioning, focusing on the development of prone-related pressure ulcers. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in the hub COVID-19 center in Milan (Italy), between March and June 2020. All patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care unit on invasive mechanical ventilation and treated with prone positioning were included. Association between prone-related pressure ulcers and selected variables was explored by the means of logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 219 proning cycles were performed on 63 patients, aged 57.6 (10.8) and predominantly obese males (66.7%). The main complications recorded were: prone-related pressure ulcers (30.2%), bleeding (25.4%) and medical device displacement (12.7%), even if none unplanned extubation was recorded. Bleeding of upper airways represented the most common site (17.5%). Only 15 prone positioning cycles (6.8%) were interrupted, requiring staff to roll the patient back in the supine position. The likelihood of pressure ulcers development was independently associated with the duration of prone positioning, once adjusting for age, hypoxemic level, and nutritional status (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.04 to 3.6). CONCLUSION: The use of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 was a safe and feasible treatment, also in obese patients, who might deserve more surveillance and active prevention by intensive care unit staff.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- active prevention and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1
- active prevention and logistic regression: 1, 2
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and additional care: 1, 2, 3
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and adjunctive treatment: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lombardy region: 1, 2
- additional care and adjunctive treatment: 1
- additional care and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- additional care and logistic regression model: 1
- additional care require and logistic regression: 1
- adjunctive treatment and logistic regression: 1, 2
- logistic regression and lombardy region: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date