Selected article for: "active prevention and logistic regression"

Author: Binda, Filippo; Galazzi, Alessandro; Marelli, Federica; Gambazza, Simone; Villa, Lucia; Vinci, Elisa; Adamini, Ileana; Laquintana, Dario
Title: Complications of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
  • Cord-id: xl0zvilf
  • Document date: 2021_6_1
  • ID: xl0zvilf
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of complications in patients with COVID-19 undergone prone positioning, focusing on the development of prone-related pressure ulcers. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in the hub COVID-19 center in Milan (Italy), between March and June 2020. All patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care unit on invasive mechanical ventilation and treated with prone positioning were included. Association between prone-related pressure ulcers and selected varia
    Document: OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of complications in patients with COVID-19 undergone prone positioning, focusing on the development of prone-related pressure ulcers. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in the hub COVID-19 center in Milan (Italy), between March and June 2020. All patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care unit on invasive mechanical ventilation and treated with prone positioning were included. Association between prone-related pressure ulcers and selected variables was explored by the means of logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 219 proning cycles were performed on 63 patients, aged 57.6 (10.8) and predominantly obese males (66.7%). The main complications recorded were: prone-related pressure ulcers (30.2%), bleeding (25.4%) and medical device displacement (12.7%), even if none unplanned extubation was recorded. Bleeding of upper airways represented the most common site (17.5%). Only 15 prone positioning cycles (6.8%) were interrupted, requiring staff to roll the patient back in the supine position. The likelihood of pressure ulcers development was independently associated with the duration of prone positioning, once adjusting for age, hypoxemic level, and nutritional status (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.04 to 3.6). CONCLUSION: The use of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 was a safe and feasible treatment, also in obese patients, who might deserve more surveillance and active prevention by intensive care unit staff.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • active administration and low molecular: 1
    • active administration and low molecular weight: 1
    • active prevention and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1
    • active prevention and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • active prevention and low molecular: 1, 2
    • active prevention and low molecular weight: 1, 2
    • active prevention and low molecular weight heparin: 1, 2
    • active prevention surveillance and low molecular: 1
    • active prevention surveillance and low molecular weight: 1
    • active prevention surveillance and low molecular weight heparin: 1