Selected article for: "lockdown policy and low infection"

Author: Wacharapluesadee, S.; Kaewpom, T.; Ampoot, W.; Ghai, S.; Khamhang, W.; Worachotsueptrakun, K.; Wanthong, P.; Nopvichai, C.; Supharatpariyakorn, T.; Putcharoen, O.; Paitoonpong, L.; Suwanpimolkul, G.; Jantarabenjakul, W.; Hemachudha, P.; Krichphiphat, A.; Buathong, R.; Plipat, T.; Hemachudha, T.
Title: Evaluating efficiency of pooling specimens for PCR-based detection of COVID-19
  • Cord-id: yaapimwn
  • Document date: 2020_5_6
  • ID: yaapimwn
    Snippet: In the age of a pandemic, such as the ongoing one caused by SARS-CoV-2, the world faces limited supply of tests, PPE and reagents, and factories are struggling to meet the growing demands. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pooling specimen for testing of SARS-CoV-2 virus, to determine whether costs and resource savings could be achieved without impacting the sensitivity of the testing. Ten specimens were pooled for testing, containing either one or two known positive specimen of varyi
    Document: In the age of a pandemic, such as the ongoing one caused by SARS-CoV-2, the world faces limited supply of tests, PPE and reagents, and factories are struggling to meet the growing demands. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pooling specimen for testing of SARS-CoV-2 virus, to determine whether costs and resource savings could be achieved without impacting the sensitivity of the testing. Ten specimens were pooled for testing, containing either one or two known positive specimen of varying viral concentrations. Pooling specimens did not affect the sensitivity of detecting SARS-CoV-2, and the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) between testing of pooling specimen and subsequent individual testing was not significantly different using paired t-test. This study also identified cost savings garnered from pooling of specimen for testing at 4 differing prevalence rates, ranging from 0.1-10%. Pooling specimens to test for COVID-19 infection in low prevalence areas or in low risk population can dramatically decrease the resources burden on lab operations by up to 80%. This paves the possibility for large-scale population screening, allowing for assured policy decisions by governmental bodies to ease lockdown restrictions in areas with low incidence of infection, or with lower risk populations.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accuracy sensitivity and acid extraction: 1, 2
    • accuracy sensitivity and active surveillance: 1
    • accuracy sensitivity and low high sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • accuracy sensitivity and low incidence: 1, 2
    • accuracy sensitivity and low infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • accuracy sensitivity and low infection rate: 1
    • accuracy sensitivity and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • accuracy sensitivity and low prevalence area: 1, 2
    • accuracy sensitivity and low prevalence population: 1
    • accuracy sensitivity and magnetic bead: 1, 2
    • acid extraction and low infection: 1, 2, 3
    • acid extraction and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acid extraction and magnetic bead: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • active surveillance and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • active surveillance and low infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • active surveillance and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • active surveillance and low prevalence area: 1, 2
    • active surveillance and low prevalence population: 1
    • active surveillance and low risk population: 1