Author: Gao, Yang; Xiao, Xiong; Han, Bangcheng; Li, Guilin; Ning, Xiaolin; Wang, Defeng; Cai, Weidong; Kikinis, Ron; Berkovsky, Shlomo; Di Ieva, Antonio; Zhang, Liwei; Ji, Nan; Liu, Sidong
Title: Deep Learning Methodology for Differentiating Glioma Recurrence From Radiation Necrosis Using Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Algorithm Development and Validation Cord-id: ybofxpyb Document date: 2020_11_17
ID: ybofxpyb
Snippet: BACKGROUND: The radiological differential diagnosis between tumor recurrence and radiation-induced necrosis (ie, pseudoprogression) is of paramount importance in the management of glioma patients. OBJECTIVE: This research aims to develop a deep learning methodology for automated differentiation of tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis based on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 146 patients who underwent radiation therapy after glioma resecti
Document: BACKGROUND: The radiological differential diagnosis between tumor recurrence and radiation-induced necrosis (ie, pseudoprogression) is of paramount importance in the management of glioma patients. OBJECTIVE: This research aims to develop a deep learning methodology for automated differentiation of tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis based on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 146 patients who underwent radiation therapy after glioma resection and presented with suspected recurrent lesions at the follow-up MRI examination were selected for analysis. Routine MRI scans were acquired from each patient, including T1, T2, and gadolinium-contrast-enhanced T1 sequences. Of those cases, 96 (65.8%) were confirmed as glioma recurrence on postsurgical pathological examination, while 50 (34.2%) were diagnosed as necrosis. A light-weighted deep neural network (DNN) (ie, efficient radionecrosis neural network [ERN-Net]) was proposed to learn radiological features of gliomas and necrosis from MRI scans. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate performance of the model in both image-wise and subject-wise classifications. Preoperative diagnostic performance of the model was also compared to that of the state-of-the-art DNN models and five experienced neurosurgeons. RESULTS: DNN models based on multimodal MRI outperformed single-modal models. ERN-Net achieved the highest AUC in both image-wise (0.915) and subject-wise (0.958) classification tasks. The evaluated DNN models achieved an average sensitivity of 0.947 (SD 0.033), specificity of 0.817 (SD 0.075), and accuracy of 0.903 (SD 0.026), which were significantly better than the tested neurosurgeons (P=.02 in sensitivity and P<.001 in specificity and accuracy). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning offers a useful computational tool for the differential diagnosis between recurrent gliomas and necrosis. The proposed ERN-Net model, a simple and effective DNN model, achieved excellent performance on routine MRI scans and showed a high clinical applicability.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accuracy high sensitivity and low specificity high sensitivity: 1, 2
- accuracy high sensitivity and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- accuracy high sensitivity and magnetic resonance: 1
- accuracy specificity and low level feature: 1
- accuracy specificity and low performance: 1, 2, 3, 4
- accuracy specificity and low specificity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- accuracy specificity and low specificity high sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accuracy specificity and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accuracy specificity and machine learning method: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- accuracy specificity and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- low performance and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- low performance and magnetic field: 1, 2
- low performance and magnetic resonance: 1, 2
- low specificity and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- low specificity and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3
- low specificity high sensitivity and machine learning: 1, 2
- low specificity high sensitivity and magnetic resonance: 1
- machine learning and magnetic field: 1, 2, 3
- machine learning and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date