Selected article for: "academic center and machine learning model"
Author: Wu, Joy Tzung-yu; Hoz, Miguel 'Angel Armengol de la; Kuo, Po-Chih; Paguio, Joseph Alexander; Yao, Jasper Seth; Dee, Edward Christopher; Yeung, Wesley; Jurado, Jerry; Moulick, Achintya; Milazzo, Carmelo; Peinado, Paloma; Villares, Paula; Cubillo, Antonio; Varona, Jos'e Felipe; Lee, Hyung-Chul; Estirado, Alberto; Castellano, Jos'e Maria; Celi, Leo Anthony
Title: Developing and validating multi-modal models for mortality prediction in COVID-19 patients: a multi-center retrospective study
  • Cord-id: yrbfvecs
  • Document date: 2021_9_1
    • ID: yrbfvecs
    Snippet: The unprecedented global crisis brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic has sparked numerous efforts to create predictive models for the detection and prognostication of SARS-CoV-2 infections with the goal of helping health systems allocate resources. Machine learning models, in particular, hold promise for their ability to leverage patient clinical information and medical images for prediction. However, most of the published COVID-19 prediction models thus far have little clinical utility due to
    Document: The unprecedented global crisis brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic has sparked numerous efforts to create predictive models for the detection and prognostication of SARS-CoV-2 infections with the goal of helping health systems allocate resources. Machine learning models, in particular, hold promise for their ability to leverage patient clinical information and medical images for prediction. However, most of the published COVID-19 prediction models thus far have little clinical utility due to methodological flaws and lack of appropriate validation. In this paper, we describe our methodology to develop and validate multi-modal models for COVID-19 mortality prediction using multi-center patient data. The models for COVID-19 mortality prediction were developed using retrospective data from Madrid, Spain (N=2547) and were externally validated in patient cohorts from a community hospital in New Jersey, USA (N=242) and an academic center in Seoul, Republic of Korea (N=336). The models we developed performed differently across various clinical settings, underscoring the need for a guided strategy when employing machine learning for clinical decision-making. We demonstrated that using features from both the structured electronic health records and chest X-ray imaging data resulted in better 30-day-mortality prediction performance across all three datasets (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves: 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-0.87), 0.76 (0.70-0.82), and 0.95 (0.92-0.98)). We discuss the rationale for the decisions made at every step in developing the models and have made our code available to the research community. We employed the best machine learning practices for clinical model development. Our goal is to create a toolkit that would assist investigators and organizations in building multi-modal models for prediction, classification and/or optimization.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accuracy f1 score and adam optimizer: 1, 2
    • accuracy f1 score and additive explanation: 1
    • accurate prediction and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • activation function and adam optimizer: 1, 2, 3
    • activation function and adam optimizer loss function: 1
    • activation function and admission time: 1
    • additional version and admission time: 1