Author: Généreux, Mélissa; David, Marc D; O’Sullivan, Tracey; Carignan, Marie-Ève; Blouin-Genest, Gabriel; Champagne-Poirier, Olivier; Champagne, Éric; Burlone, Nathalie; Qadar, Zeeshan; Herbosa, Teodoro; Hung, Kevin; Ribeiro-Alves, Gleisse; Arruda, Horacio; Michel, Pascal; Law, Ron; Poirier, Alain; Murray, Virginia; Chan, Emily; Roy, Mathieu
Title: Communication strategies and media discourses in the age of COVID-19: an urgent need for action Cord-id: zu3t838z Document date: 2020_12_9
ID: zu3t838z
Snippet: Identified in December 2019 in China, the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). Pandemics share features that increase fear. While some fear can stimulate preventive health behaviors, extreme fear can lead to adverse psychological and behavioral response. The media play a major role shaping these responses. When dealing with a PHEIC, the authorities’ communication strategies are embedded in a multilevel governance and a highly
Document: Identified in December 2019 in China, the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). Pandemics share features that increase fear. While some fear can stimulate preventive health behaviors, extreme fear can lead to adverse psychological and behavioral response. The media play a major role shaping these responses. When dealing with a PHEIC, the authorities’ communication strategies are embedded in a multilevel governance and a highly hierarchal system, which adds another layer of complexity. Carrying out more ‘real-world research’ is crucial to generate evidence relating to the psychosocial and behavioral aspects involved during the COVID-19 pandemic and how it is shaped by authorities and media discourses. Interdisciplinary research and international collaborations could contribute to improve our understanding and management of risk information. Emerging from a socio-ecological perspective, future research must integrate multilevel analytical elements, to ensure triangulation of evidence and co-constructing robust recommendations. A mixed-method approach should be privileged to address these issues. At the micro-level, a population-based survey could be conducted in various jurisdictions to assess and compare psychosocial issues according to sociocultural groups. Then, a quantitative/qualitative discourse analysis of the media could be performed. Finally, a network analysis could allow assessing how official information flows and circulates across levels of governance. The COVID-19 represents an opportunity to evaluate the impacts of information/communication strategy and misinformation on various cultural and socioeconomic groups, providing important lessons that could be applied to future health emergencies and disasters.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- academic research and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- academic research and macro level: 1
- acute outbreak and local community: 1
- acute outbreak and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute outbreak and low income people: 1
- acute sars respiratory syndrome and local community: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- acute sars respiratory syndrome and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute sars respiratory syndrome and low income people: 1, 2, 3
- acute sars respiratory syndrome and macro level: 1, 2
- adaptive behavior and low income: 1
- additional challenge and low income: 1, 2
- local community and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- local community and low income people: 1, 2
- local community and macro level: 1
- low income and macro level: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date