Selected article for: "acute asthma agonist and low quality evidence"

Author: Baggott, C.; Hardy, J.; Sparks, J.; Sabbagh, D.; Beasley, R.; Weatherall, M.; Fingleton, J.
Title: Adrenaline (epinephrine) compared to selective beta-2-agonist in adults or children with acute asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Cord-id: 0vcav5b4
  • Document date: 2021_2_19
  • ID: 0vcav5b4
    Snippet: Background International asthma guidelines recommend against adrenaline administration in acute asthma unless associated with anaphylaxis or angioedema. However, administration of intra-muscular adrenaline in addition to nebulised selective {beta}2-agonist is recommended for acute severe or life-threatening asthma in many pre-hospital guidelines. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of adrenaline in comparison to selective {beta}2-agonist in acute asthma. Methods We include
    Document: Background International asthma guidelines recommend against adrenaline administration in acute asthma unless associated with anaphylaxis or angioedema. However, administration of intra-muscular adrenaline in addition to nebulised selective {beta}2-agonist is recommended for acute severe or life-threatening asthma in many pre-hospital guidelines. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of adrenaline in comparison to selective {beta}2-agonist in acute asthma. Methods We included peer-reviewed publications of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled children or adults in any healthcare setting and compared adrenaline by any route to selective {beta}2-agonist by any route for an acute asthma exacerbation. The primary outcome was treatment failure, as indicated by hospitalisation, stay >24hrs in emergency department, need for intubation, or death. Results Thirty-eight of 1,140 studies were included, involving 2,275 participants. Overall quality of evidence was low. There was significant statistical heterogeneity, I2=56%. The pooled odds ratio for treatment failure with adrenaline versus selective {beta}2-agonist was 0.99 (0.74 to 1.34), p=0.96. There was strong evidence that recruitment age-group was associated with different estimates of the risk of treatment failure; with studies recruiting adults-only having a lower risk of treatment failure with adrenaline. It was not possible to determine whether adrenaline in addition to selective {beta}2-agonist improved outcomes. Conclusion The limited evidence available suggests that adrenaline and selective {beta}2-agonists have similar efficacy in acute asthma and does not support the use of adrenaline in addition to selective {beta}2-agonists in acute asthma. There is a need for high-quality double-blind RCTs to address this issue. PROSPERO registration number CRD42017079472

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute asthma and low quality: 1, 2
    • acute asthma and lung function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
    • acute asthma exacerbation and low quality: 1, 2
    • acute asthma exacerbation and lung function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute asthma exacerbation route and low quality: 1
    • acute asthma similar efficacy and low quality: 1
    • address aim and low quality: 1
    • administration route and lung function: 1, 2, 3
    • adolescent adult and low quality: 1, 2, 3
    • adrenaline administration and low quality: 1, 2
    • adrenaline administration and lung function: 1
    • adrenaline administration recommend and low quality: 1
    • adrenergic receptor and lung function: 1
    • low quality and lung function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5