Author: Campbell, T. W.; Wilson, M. P.; Roder, H.; MaWhinney, S.; Georgantas, R. W.; Maguire, L. K.; Roder, J.; Erlandson, K. M.
Title: Predicting Prognosis in COVID-19 Patients using Machine Learning and Readily Available Clinical Data Cord-id: 1eoggt72 Document date: 2021_2_1
ID: 1eoggt72
Snippet: Rationale Prognostic tools for aiding in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients could help improve outcome by identifying patients at higher or lower risk of severe disease. Objectives The study objective was to develop models to stratify patients by risk of severe outcomes during COVID-19 hospitalization using readily available information at hospital admission. Methods Hierarchical ensemble classification models were trained on a set of 229 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 to predi
Document: Rationale Prognostic tools for aiding in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients could help improve outcome by identifying patients at higher or lower risk of severe disease. Objectives The study objective was to develop models to stratify patients by risk of severe outcomes during COVID-19 hospitalization using readily available information at hospital admission. Methods Hierarchical ensemble classification models were trained on a set of 229 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 to predict severe outcomes, including ICU admission, development of ARDS, or intubation, using easily attainable attributes including basic patient characteristics, vital signs at admission, and basic lab results collected at time of presentation. Each test stratifies patients into groups of increasing risk. An additional cohort of 330 patients was used for blinded, independent validation. Shapley value analysis evaluated which attributes contributed most to the models' predictions of risk. Measurements and Main Results Test performance was assessed using precision (positive predictive value) and recall (sensitivity) of the final risk groups. All test cut-offs were fixed prior to blinded validation. In both development and validation, the tests achieved precision in the lowest risk groups near or above 0.9. The proportion of patients with severe outcomes significantly increased across increasing risk groups. While the importance of attributes varied by test and patient, CRP, LDH, and D-dimer were often found to be important in the assignment of risk label. Conclusions Risk of severe outcomes for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection can be assessed using machine learning-based models based
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission ards risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission ards risk predict: 1
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission time collect: 1
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome predict and logistic regression: 1, 2
- acute inflammation and additional validation: 1
- acute inflammation and admission time: 1, 2, 3
- acute inflammation and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- additional validation and admission time: 1
- additional validation and logistic regression: 1, 2
- admission ards and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- admission ards risk and logistic regression: 1
- admission time and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date