Author: Alâ€Hity, Shams; Bhamra, Navdeep; Kumar, Ravi; Gupta, Keshav Kumar; Howard, James; Jolly, Karan; Darr, Adnan
Title: Personal protective equipment guidance during a global pandemic: A statistical analysis of National perceived confidence, knowledge and educational deficits amongst UKâ€based doctors Cord-id: 1owvcmvx Document date: 2021_1_27
ID: 1owvcmvx
Snippet: INTRODUCTION: On the 11th of March 2020, the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared a global pandemic following the upsurge of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19). Unprecedented global demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) resulted in restricted availability, as well as evolving guidance on use, the latter of which was complicated by conflicting guidance provided by numerous healthcare bodies. AIM: To assess perceived confidence and knowledge of PPE guidance as published b
Document: INTRODUCTION: On the 11th of March 2020, the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared a global pandemic following the upsurge of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19). Unprecedented global demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) resulted in restricted availability, as well as evolving guidance on use, the latter of which was complicated by conflicting guidance provided by numerous healthcare bodies. AIM: To assess perceived confidence and knowledge of PPE guidance as published by Public Health England (PHE) amongst doctors of varying specialties and grades. METHOD: A nationwide 11â€point survey comprising of multipleâ€choice questions (MCQs) and a 5â€point Likert scale assessing perceived confidence was disseminated to UKâ€based doctors using multiple platforms. Statistical analysis using oneâ€way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey's honest significant difference (Tukey HSD) and Pearson's chiâ€squared test was undertaken to assess for statistical significance. RESULTS: Data collated from 697 respondents revealed that average perceived confidence was low across all specialties and grades. Notably, 59% (n = 411) felt they had received insufficient education regarding upâ€toâ€date guidance, with 81% (n = 565) advocating further training. Anaesthetics and ophthalmology were highest and lowest scoring specialties in knowledgeâ€based MCQs, achieving scores of 59% and 31%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between specialty, but not grade. CONCLUSION: Ensuring uniformity in published guidance, coupled with education may aid knowledge and subsequent confidence regarding the appropriate use of PPE. The absence of a unified consensus and sustained training not only poses significant ramifications for patient and healthcare professional (HCP) safety, but also risks further depletion of already sparse resources. Because of the novelty of COVIDâ€19, appropriate PPE is continually evolving leaving an absence in formal training and education. This paper reveals insight into confidence and knowledge of PPE amongst doctors of various specialities/grades during a global pandemic, highlighting key deficits in education and training.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- adequate training and low confidence: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date