Author: Ucan, Anıl; Cerci, Pamir; Efe, Serdar; Akgun, Hakan; Ozmen, Ahmet; Yagmuroglu, Aysel; Bilgin, Muzaffer; Avci, Deniz
Title: Benefits of treatment with favipiravir in hospitalized patients for COVID-19: a retrospective observational case–control study Cord-id: 29q8z95i Document date: 2021_5_25
ID: 29q8z95i
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Although more than a year past since COVID-19 was defined, there is no specific treatment yet. Since COVID-19 management differs over time, it is hard to determine which therapy is more efficacious. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the regimen with Favipiravir (FPV) and determine if the timing of FPV addition offers any improvement. METHODS: A retrospective observational case-controlled cohort study was performed between March and September 2020, including adults w
Document: BACKGROUND: Although more than a year past since COVID-19 was defined, there is no specific treatment yet. Since COVID-19 management differs over time, it is hard to determine which therapy is more efficacious. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the regimen with Favipiravir (FPV) and determine if the timing of FPV addition offers any improvement. METHODS: A retrospective observational case-controlled cohort study was performed between March and September 2020, including adults with COVID-19 in a single-center in Turkey. We categorized patients into age-sex matched three groups, group 1 (n = 48) and group 2 (n = 48) included patients treated with the combination of FPV plus Hydroxychloroquine (HQ) early and late, respectively. Group 3 (n = 48) consisted of patients on HQ monotherapy. In Group 2, if the respiratory or clinic condition had not improved sufficiently, FPV was added on or after day 3. RESULTS: We found that starting FPV early had an impact on PCR negativity and the progression of the disease. 'No progression' was defined as the absence of a new finding in the control radiological examination and the absence of accompanying clinical deterioration. Also, the decrease in C-reactive protein (CRP) was greater in Group 1 than Group 3 (p < 0.001). However, we found that early initiation of FPV treatment did not have a positive effect on the estimated survival time. CONCLUSIONS: According to this retrospective study results, we believe that for better clinical outcomes, FPV treatment should be started promptly to enhance antiviral effects and improve clinical outcomes.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver function test: 1, 2
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lombardy region: 1, 2
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and low number: 1
- admission clinical outcome and liver function: 1
- admission clinical outcome and lopinavir ritonavir: 1
- liver disease and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- liver disease and low number: 1, 2
- liver function and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
- liver function and low number: 1
- liver function test and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3
- log rank test compare and low number: 1
- lombardy region and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2
- lombardy region and low number: 1, 2
- lopinavir ritonavir and low number: 1
- lopinavir ritonavir and lpv rtv viral clearance: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date