Selected article for: "additional data and logistic regression model"

Author: Papamihali, Kristi; Yoon, Minha; Graham, Brittany; Karamouzian, Mohammad; Slaunwhite, Amanda K.; Tsang, Vivian; Young, Sara; Buxton, Jane A.
Title: Convenience and comfort: reasons reported for using drugs alone among clients of harm reduction sites in British Columbia, Canada
  • Cord-id: 3torkj84
  • Document date: 2020_11_23
  • ID: 3torkj84
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: North American communities are severely impacted by the overdose crisis, particularly in British Columbia (BC), which has the highest toxic drug overdose death rate in Canada. Most fatal overdoses in BC occurred among individuals using alone and in private residences. This study aimed to assess prevalence and reasons for using drugs alone among people accessing harm reduction services in BC. METHODS: We recruited harm reduction supply distribution site clients from 22 communities acr
    Document: BACKGROUND: North American communities are severely impacted by the overdose crisis, particularly in British Columbia (BC), which has the highest toxic drug overdose death rate in Canada. Most fatal overdoses in BC occurred among individuals using alone and in private residences. This study aimed to assess prevalence and reasons for using drugs alone among people accessing harm reduction services in BC. METHODS: We recruited harm reduction supply distribution site clients from 22 communities across BC. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression were used to describe factors associated with using alone. Thematic analysis of free-text responses providing reasons for using alone were grouped with survey data and additional themes identified. RESULTS: Overall, 75.8% (n = 314) of the study sample (N = 414) reported using drugs alone within the last week. Those that reported using alone did not differ from those that did not by gender, age, urbanicity, or preferred drug use method. Among those that used alone, 73.2% (n = 230) used opioids, 76.8% (n = 241) used crystal meth, 41.4% (n = 130) used crack/cocaine, and 44.6% (n = 140) used alcohol in the past week. Polysubstance use involving stimulants, opioids, and/or benzodiazepines was reported by 68.5% (n = 215) of those that used alone. Additionally, 22.9% (n = 72) of those that used alone had experienced an opioid and/or stimulant overdose in the past 6 months. In a multivariable logistic regression model, having no regular housing and past week crack/cocaine use were associated with using alone (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.27; 95% CI 1.20–4.27 and AOR: 2.10; 95% CI 1.15–3.82, respectively). The most common reason reported for using alone was convenience and comfort of using alone (44.3%). Additional reasons included: stigma/hiding drug use (14.0%); having no one around (11.7%); safety (9.6%); and not wanting to share drugs with others (8.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Using drugs alone, particularly for convenience and comfort, is ubiquitous among people accessing harm reduction services. Overdose prevention measures that go beyond individual behaviour changes, including providing a safer supply of drugs and eliminating stigma, are paramount to mitigate harms. These interventions are especially necessary as emergence of coronavirus disease may further exacerbate unpredictability of illicit drug content and overdose risk.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • additional challenge and logistic regression model: 1
    • adjusted model and living condition: 1
    • adjusted model and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • adjusted model and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • adjusted model and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • adjusted odd and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • adjusted odd and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3
    • adjusted odd and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • adjusted odd ratio and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • adjusted odd ratio and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3
    • adjusted odd ratio and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • live experience and logistic regression: 1
    • living condition and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • living condition and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • logistic regression analysis and low perceive: 1
    • logistic regression and low perceive: 1