Author: Ford, Nathan; Vitoria, Marco; Rangaraj, Ajay; Norris, Susan L; Calmy, Alexandra; Doherty, Meg
Title: Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of antiretroviral drugs against SARS, MERS or COVIDâ€19: initial assessment Cord-id: 4obggisp Document date: 2020_4_15
ID: 4obggisp
Snippet: INTRODUCTION: Several antiretroviral drugs are being considered for the treatment of COVIDâ€19, the disease caused by a newly identified coronavirus, (SARSâ€CoVâ€2). We systematically reviewed the clinical outcomes of using antiretroviral drugs for the prevention and treatment of coronaviruses and planned clinical trials. METHODS: Three databases were screened from inception to 30 March 2020 for studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients with SARS, MERS or COVIDâ€19 treated with antiret
Document: INTRODUCTION: Several antiretroviral drugs are being considered for the treatment of COVIDâ€19, the disease caused by a newly identified coronavirus, (SARSâ€CoVâ€2). We systematically reviewed the clinical outcomes of using antiretroviral drugs for the prevention and treatment of coronaviruses and planned clinical trials. METHODS: Three databases were screened from inception to 30 March 2020 for studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients with SARS, MERS or COVIDâ€19 treated with antiretrovirals. RESULTS: From an initial screen of 433 titles, two randomized trials and 24 observational studies provided clinical outcome data on the use of antiretroviral drugs; most studies reported outcomes using LPV/r as treatment. Of the 21 observational studies reporting treatment outcomes, there were three studies among patients with SARS, six studies among patients with MERS and 12 studies among patients with COVIDâ€19. In one randomized trial 99 patients with severe COVIDâ€19 illness were randomized to receive LPV/r (400/100 mg twice a day) and 100 patients to standard of care for 14 days: LPV/r was not associated with a statistically significant difference in time to clinical improvement, although LPV/r given within 12 days of symptoms was associated with shorter time to clinical improvement; 28 day mortality was numerically lower in the LPV/r group (14/99) compared to the control group (25/100), but this difference was not statistically significant. The second trial found no benefit. The certainty of the evidence for the randomized trials was low. In the observational studies 3 out of 361 patients who received LPV/r died; the certainty of evidence was very low. Three studies reported a possible protective effect of LPV/r as postâ€exposure prophylaxis. Again, the certainty of the evidence was very low due to uncertainty due to limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the available evidence it is uncertain whether LPV/r and other antiretrovirals improve clinical outcomes or prevent infection among patients at high risk of acquiring COVIDâ€19.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute respiratory syndrome and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and lopinavir ritonavir group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- lopinavir ritonavir and lpv receive: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date