Author: Sabe, Ashraf A.; Percy, Edward; Kaneko, Tsuyoshi; Plichta, Ryan P.; Hughes, G. Chad
Title: When to Consider Deferral of Surgery in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Review Cord-id: 5ykvs73x Document date: 2020_8_31
ID: 5ykvs73x
Snippet: Background Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency with an operative mortality of up to 30%, a rate which has not changed meaningfully in over two decades. A growing body of research has highlighted several comorbidities and presenting factors in which delay or permanent deferral of surgery may be considered; however, modern comprehensive summative reviews are lacking. The urgency and timing of this review are underscored by significant challenges in resource utilization p
Document: Background Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency with an operative mortality of up to 30%, a rate which has not changed meaningfully in over two decades. A growing body of research has highlighted several comorbidities and presenting factors in which delay or permanent deferral of surgery may be considered; however, modern comprehensive summative reviews are lacking. The urgency and timing of this review are underscored by significant challenges in resource utilization posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. This review provides an update on the current understanding of risk assessment, surgical candidacy, and operative timing in patients with ATAAD. Methods A literature search was conducted through PubMed and Embase databases to identify relevant studies relating to risk assessment in ATAAD. Articles were selected via group consensus based on quality and relevance. Results Several patient factors have been identified which increase risk in ATAAD repair. In particular, frailty, advanced age, prior cardiac surgery, and use of novel anticoagulant medications have been studied. The understanding of malperfusion syndromes has also expanded significantly, including recommendations for surgical delay. Finally, approaches to triage have been significantly influenced by resource limitations related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. While medical management remains a reasonable option in carefully selected patients at prohibitive risk for open surgery, endovascular therapies for treatment of ATAAD are rapidly evolving. Conclusions Early surgical repair remains the preferred treatment for most patients with ATAAD, however, improvements in risk stratification should guide appropriate delay or permanent deferral of surgery in select individuals.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abdominal pain and activate factor: 1
- abdominal pain and acute aortic dissection: 1
- abdominal pain and acute dissection: 1
- abdominal pain and acute pathology: 1, 2, 3
- abdominal pain and acute type: 1, 2, 3, 4
- abdominal pain and adequate resource: 1
- abdominal pain and adequate resource planning: 1
- abdominal pain and admission chest: 1, 2, 3, 4
- abdominal pain and long short: 1, 2, 3, 4
- abdominal pain and long short term: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- abdominal pain and long term survival: 1, 2
- abdominal pain and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- absence presence and activate factor: 1
- absence presence and acute type: 1, 2
- absence presence and administration study: 1
- absence presence and admission chest: 1, 2
- absence presence and long duration: 1, 2
- absence presence and long short: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- absence presence and long short term: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date