Selected article for: "economy society and herd immunity"

Author: Zoltan Neufeld; Hamid Khataee
Title: Targeted adaptive isolation strategy for Covid-19 pandemic
  • Document date: 2020_3_31
  • ID: 80d9p4j8_16
    Snippet: According to Equation (3), reducing the loss in S V requires reducing the product µI total . While social distancing aims to reduce the total infected population by decreasing R 0 , this model helps to evaluate alternative or complementary measures targeting the reduction of parameter µ by isolating/shielding the vulnerable population from the infections. This could be achieved by clearly differentiated measures targeted to the high-risk group:.....
    Document: According to Equation (3), reducing the loss in S V requires reducing the product µI total . While social distancing aims to reduce the total infected population by decreasing R 0 , this model helps to evaluate alternative or complementary measures targeting the reduction of parameter µ by isolating/shielding the vulnerable population from the infections. This could be achieved by clearly differentiated measures targeted to the high-risk group: restricting mobility, providing free homedelivery of food and medication, increased support addressing communication and healthcare needs, and providing separated living space where needed. Since the isolation strategy targets a subpopulation, a radical isolation is likely to be more effective than uniform social distancing, and at a smaller cost for the economy and for the general functioning of the society. Our model allows the comparison of general social distancing affecting both k and µ (represented by the diagonal arrow in Fig. 2(c) ) and targeted isolation affecting µ only (vertical arrow in Fig. 2(c) ). The overall fatality of the pandemic is primarily driven by the size of the infected vulnerable population, µI total . Depending on the epidemiological situation, the public response should be a mixture of the two efforts. For low values of R 0 , general social distancing is more effective and has the potential to suppress the epidemic. At higher R 0 values, however, the optimal public response should focus more heavily on isolation of the vulnerable population. With limited resources available, when the strategy is primarily based on drastic targeted isolation over a shorter time, the end result is a collectively immune population resistant to further infections ("herd immunity"). It is also apparent that the integral in Equation (3) can be reduced by decreasing µ in a timedependent manner. This can be achieved by monitoring the progression of the infection I(t) via statistically representative testing of different regions and cities, and intensifying/relaxing the isolation of the vulnerable population accordingly.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • µ decrease and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • µ decrease and infected population: 1
    • µI total and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • µI total and high risk group: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • µI total and increase support: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • µI total and infected population: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • different region and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • end result and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • end result and infected population: 1, 2, 3
    • epidemic suppress and high risk: 1
    • epidemic suppress and infected population: 1
    • epidemiological situation and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • epidemiological situation and high risk group: 1
    • epidemiological situation and infected population: 1
    • general social distancing and high risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • general social distancing and infected population: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • healthcare need and high risk group: 1, 2, 3
    • healthcare need and increase support: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • healthcare need and infected population: 1