Selected article for: "learning rate and network training"

Author: Guillaume Chassagnon; Maria Vakalopoulou; Enzo Battistella; Stergios Christodoulidis; Trieu-Nghi Hoang-Thi; Severine Dangeard; Eric Deutsch; Fabrice Andre; Enora Guillo; Nara Halm; Stefany El Hajj; Florian Bompard; Sophie Neveu; Chahinez Hani; Ines Saab; Alienor Campredon; Hasmik Koulakian; Souhail Bennani; Gael Freche; Aurelien Lombard; Laure Fournier; Hippolyte Monnier; Teodor Grand; Jules Gregory; Antoine Khalil; Elyas Mahdjoub; Pierre-Yves Brillet; Stephane Tran Ba; Valerie Bousson; Marie-Pierre Revel; Nikos Paragios
Title: AI-Driven CT-based quantification, staging and short-term outcome prediction of COVID-19 pneumonia
  • Document date: 2020_4_22
  • ID: nxm1jr0x_24
    Snippet: For the 2D experiments we used classic stochastic gradient descent for the optimization with initial learning rate = 0.01, decrease of learning rate = 2.5 · 10 −3 every 10 epochs, momentum =0.9 and weight decay =5 · 10 −4 . For the 3D experiments we used the AMSGrad and a learning rate of 0.001. The training of a single network for both 2D and 3D network was completed in approximately 12 hours using a GeForce GTX 1080 GPU, while the predict.....
    Document: For the 2D experiments we used classic stochastic gradient descent for the optimization with initial learning rate = 0.01, decrease of learning rate = 2.5 · 10 −3 every 10 epochs, momentum =0.9 and weight decay =5 · 10 −4 . For the 3D experiments we used the AMSGrad and a learning rate of 0.001. The training of a single network for both 2D and 3D network was completed in approximately 12 hours using a GeForce GTX 1080 GPU, while the prediction for a single CT scan was done in a few seconds. Training and validation curves for one template of AtlasNet and the 3D network are shown in Figure 6 . Both Dice similarity score and Haussdorff distances were higher with the 2D approach compared to the 3D approach (Figure ??) . However, the combination of their probability scores led to a significant improvement. Thus, the ensemble of 2D and 3D architectures was selected for the final COVID-19 segmentation tool.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • CT scan and probability score: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • CT scan and segmentation tool: 1, 2
    • CT scan and significant improvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • initial learning rate and learning rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • learn rate and rate learn: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • learn rate and significant improvement: 1
    • learning rate and significant improvement: 1
    • rate learn and significant improvement: 1