Author: El Guerche-Séblain, Clotilde; Chakir, Lina; Nageshwaran, Gopinath; Harris, Rebecca C.; Sevoz-Couche, Caroline; Vitoux, Olivier; Vanhems, Philippe
Title: Experience from five Asia-Pacific countries during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: Mitigation strategies and epidemiology outcomes Cord-id: a1hwr4yz Document date: 2021_10_12
ID: a1hwr4yz
Snippet: BACKGROUND: With no vaccines or specific treatments, non-pharmaceutical interventions are the only tools for controlling the human-to-human transmission of the COVID-19 disease, which appeared in Wuhan, China last December and has spread globally since. Here we describe and compare the first-wave mitigation strategies and epidemiology of five Asia-Pacific countries that responded rapidly to the epidemic. METHODS: From January to April 2020, mitigation measures and epidemiological data for Singap
Document: BACKGROUND: With no vaccines or specific treatments, non-pharmaceutical interventions are the only tools for controlling the human-to-human transmission of the COVID-19 disease, which appeared in Wuhan, China last December and has spread globally since. Here we describe and compare the first-wave mitigation strategies and epidemiology of five Asia-Pacific countries that responded rapidly to the epidemic. METHODS: From January to April 2020, mitigation measures and epidemiological data for Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong were screened from official local government websites and a review of investigational studies was conducted. Daily case reports and mitigation measures information were extracted. Epidemiological estimates were calculated and compared between countries. RESULTS: All five countries combined measures, focusing on contact tracing, testing, isolation efforts and healthcare management. Epidemiological data varied temporally and geographically: incubation period ranged 3.9–7.1 days, effective reproduction number at time t (Rt) ranged 0.48–1.5, with intensive care admissions 1–3% of hospitalised patients, and case fatality rates were 0.1–3%. Extrinsic estimates to the virus were lower than global estimates. CONCLUSION: Implemented mitigation strategies in these countries allowed a rapid and successful control or delay of the first COVID-19 pandemic wave. These are valuable examples to inform subsequent waves.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abdominal pain and adequately address: 1
- abdominal pain and low number: 1
- abdominal pain and low remain: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and adequately address: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute respiratory syndrome and adoption limit: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and local community transmission: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- acute respiratory syndrome and local comparison: 1, 2
- acute respiratory syndrome and local english: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown enforce: 1, 2
- acute respiratory syndrome and longitudinal time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- acute respiratory syndrome and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62
- acute respiratory syndrome and low remain: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- acute respiratory syndrome and low risk population: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date